Quote:
if the were the same there would be no use for Enfbl skill it would just be macc
List gear with Magic Accuracy on it.
List gear with Enfeebling Magic Skill on it.
... oh.
Quote:
why do you merit enfbl skill / wear af body relic hat/hands and enfbl torque on high lv NM's and HNM's........because your trying to reach the next teir(allowing the spell to not be resisted) wich is not possible w just macc which will not do this.
What's a good macc head with >15 macc? What's a good macc body with >15 macc? What's a good macc neck with >7 macc? The reason we use these pieces has nothing to do with your theory; it's because assuming that Magic Accuracy and Skill are directly equivalent, they are the highest values of these in each slot.
Also, another counterargument to your theory: many RDMs (myself included) use a MND-heavy build for Para/Slow in order to build the potency of it, at the cost of accuracy.
Per your theory, we would not be able to land it EVER when we're giving up Enfeebling Magic Skill gear.
Yet I have been landing Para/Slow on solo NMs/Khimaira (I tend to use a more accurate set for Khim but not because this one won't land, just because it's unreliable and Slow has a long recast but regardless - this one DOES land) with
and this isn't just a case of it landing rarely (except on Khim but again he sucks) - this sticks almost all of the time on anything I fight. Why? Because MND provides magic accuracy which is directly equivalent to Enfeebling Skill, meaning my accuracy with these spells is still not bad at all.
EDIT: Another counterargument: most elemental staves provide purely magic accuracy and not enfeebling magic skill.
Are you saying that if I were to cast an enfeeble on a mob which is out of my "tier" per your theory with and without a stave, I would not find even the smallest difference in land rate?
... actually, can we find any arguments for your theory instead of counterarguments? :(