So, there's no cover-ups being occurred as far as you are concerned, huh Pleebo?
Nixon has been convicted for far less than this.
So, are you saying that the laws shown by the author have no meaning in this?
Care to explain why you say that? Besides your "FBI already investigated it" excuse on an article that accuses the FBI and Justice Department of covering up for Clinton.
I wonder if you can see the problem with your whole argument now?