Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Ramuh.Dasva said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Ramuh.Dasva said:
Punishment is fitting the crime. She killed her family therefore she should be killed.
She didn't kill her family though :/
And Hilter didn't kill anyone
And Hitler didn't get put to the death sentence.
Flionheart said:
Is this thread moving into a death penalty discussion? I don't particularly want to take it miles off topic otherwise...
This lady is getting put to death, how that is it not related to the death penalty?
You honestly think that if he didn't take the cowards way out he wouldn't have received a death sentence? I don't doubt for a second that under trial he'd be ordered to die for his crimes, and even if he wasn't, and was given prison, that'd still be a death sentence. Hell people with no vested interest in his death would jump at the shot to kill him, just to go down in history as the inmate who killed Hitler.
EDIT: I share your philosophy though.. I have no qualms with killing people, but life in prison without parole is the worse punishment of the two.. Even though generally, someone on death row does spend 20+ years just waiting to be executed..
If I were trying to decide the fate of someone and wanted to make their existence as painful as possible, I'd give them life in prison without parole..