|
Pakistan
Lakshmi.Flavin
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2011-01-18 13:56:53
Interpratation, of the bible at least, is to be of a metphorical nature. You are not supposed to focus on the actual event but the meaning that you are meant to get from it. It's when things start to be taken literally that problems arise. For one you have to take the times, or even your location, in to consideration before you can fully grasp any situation. What was acceptable or common practice 2000 years ago or even 100 may be unnaceptable in the present. Times have changed as well as culture and I for one believe it is more important to take what you can out of a story and what it means rather than focusing on the action or literal interpration.
It does us no good to argue amongst ourselves on who's religion is worse or better. Theology is meant to give people hope and faith that things can be better that we ourselves can be better and to inspire to live our lives in a way that benefits not only ourselves but the community around us. I think that message gets lost a long the way many times and when it comes to practice many times falls short. I believe when people tell you that God forgives all sins it just means that you may falter and make mistakes but rather then give up know that you can get past those mistakes and move on with your life.
Another thing that you may already realize is that no one is perfect and no organization is either. It doesn't mean you should let anyone off the hook but it also doesn't mean you should condemn the entire group for the actions of a few and that goes for any religion or any type of group. I don't ask that anyone change or believe I just think that people should have respect for someone else's views and beliefs and i'm also not saying that religion exempts you from antyhing either so yea.
Basically though I think Elanabelle is just trying to speak on a topic that is felt to be important to him/her but I may disagree how they went about it. It's a lot easiar to get people to favor your cause if your not so dismissing of a certain group. killing children is definitely a grave matter but i'd try a more diplomatic approach to get people to take a greater notice in the issue at hand.
Lakshmi.Flavin
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2011-01-18 13:58:48
Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Oh religion, how you do make the world spin slower.
For some that may be so, for others it may not be so. Most things have their ups and downs.
By Wombat 2011-01-18 14:02:26
Bahamut.Milamber said:
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
That's infanticide; as in the homicide of an infant, solely based on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to enslave people themselves. It merely states that after killing all of the first born sons of an entire population, God chose this course of action to end those lives.
God, being omnipotent, could have just... Oh, I don't know, teleported them to another area of the world? Maybe just freed them?
Or just decided "Ah *** it, I'm being lazy today. I've ignored my worshippers for a few hundred years while they have been slaves, so rather than delivering them to a better place, I'll just kill a bunch of babies."
Did I say that God's actions were correct? I'm in no place to make such an assertion one way or the other.
Either way, the Bible is meant to teach people lessons about life and God. Whether this story actually took place or not is up in the air from a historical stand point.
@Kara
I'm sorry if I seem upset, I just happen to be feeling a little impatient today.
It's really nothing personal =D
I can't be mad at you for taking these verses out of context when many Christians take the Bible out of context quite a bit more than anyone else does.
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2011-01-18 14:11:21
Lakshmi.Flavin said: Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Oh religion, how you do make the world spin slower.
For some that may be so, for others it may not be so. Most things have their ups and downs.
Lunar worship is cyclical?
Lakshmi.Flavin
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2011-01-18 14:12:45
Bahamut.Milamber said: Lakshmi.Flavin said: Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Oh religion, how you do make the world spin slower. For some that may be so, for others it may not be so. Most things have their ups and downs. Lunar worship is cyclical?
Is that a serious comment?
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2011-01-18 14:13:21
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
Wombat said:
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
So it's ok to kill children as long as a) it's to right a wrong and b) God is doing it.
Also Psalms 137:9 refers to the city of Babylon and the Jews are not free to worship their God.
Psalm 137
8. O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction,
happy is he who repays you
for what you have done to us—
9. he who seizes your infants
and dashes them against the rocks.
....
He shall be reputed happy, prosperous, and highly commendable, who shall destroy Babylon.
reference
Ya, thats not calling for baby killing at all.
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2011-01-18 14:14:36
Wombat said: Bahamut.Milamber said:
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
That's infanticide; as in the homicide of an infant, solely based on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to enslave people themselves. It merely states that after killing all of the first born sons of an entire population, God chose this course of action to end those lives.
God, being omnipotent, could have just... Oh, I don't know, teleported them to another area of the world? Maybe just freed them?
Or just decided "Ah *** it, I'm being lazy today. I've ignored my worshippers for a few hundred years while they have been slaves, so rather than delivering them to a better place, I'll just kill a bunch of babies."
Did I say that God's actions were correct? I'm in no place to make such an assertion one way or the other.
Either way, the Bible is meant to teach people lessons about life and God. Whether this story actually took place or not is up in the air from a historical stand point.
@Kara
I'm sorry if I seem upset, I just happen to be feeling a little impatient today.
It's really nothing personal =D
I can't be mad at you for taking these verses out of context when many Christians take the Bible out of context quite a bit more than anyone else does.
Yes, but exactly what is this supposed to teach?
Revenge is sweet/best served cold?
Do onto others?
The victor writes the history?
From the Egyptian point of view, God would be acting in a "Satanic" manner.
Also, exactly what does this teach about God?
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2011-01-18 14:17:19
@Wombat
Yes I'm feeling a bit impatient today too.....since whenever I get to read people quoting the Qur'an it's how that it always calls for violence and can't be a peaceful religion
All religions have called for violence. My first post was in reference to someone who just pulled some violent quotes out of a book and expect that to prove that one religion > another or people > another people.
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2011-01-18 14:18:41
Lakshmi.Flavin said: Bahamut.Milamber said: Lakshmi.Flavin said: Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Oh religion, how you do make the world spin slower. For some that may be so, for others it may not be so. Most things have their ups and downs. Lunar worship is cyclical?
Is that a serious comment?
Well, some people may think religion makes the world spin slower, other people will say its the moon/general gravitational effects that make the world spin slower. Something which has ups and downs would be cyclical.
So, you could say it was a serious comment. For some that may be so, for others, it may not be so.
By Wombat 2011-01-18 14:21:51
Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
Wombat said:
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
So it's ok to kill children as long as a) it's to right a wrong and b) God is doing it.
Also Psalms 137:9 refers to the city of Babylon and the Jews are not free to worship their God.
Psalm 137
8. O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction,
happy is he who repays you
for what you have done to us—
9. he who seizes your infants
and dashes them against the rocks.
....
He shall be reputed happy, prosperous, and highly commendable, who shall destroy Babylon.
reference
Ya, thats not calling for baby killing at all.
How would you feel about a nation who burned your holy city, holy temple and a large portion of your population to the ground; only to finish by taking the "usable" portion of the population and exiling them from your homeland to their capital to work for them?
This Psalm is a plea to God from such an exiled individual. These are his words, saying that he wants the same evil to be visited upon Babylon in retribution.
It's not right. It's incomplete theology. It was spawned from anger and malice. It is an example of human desperation and what we are capable of desiring when we have been deeply hurt.
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2011-01-18 14:23:44
Lakshmi.Flavin said: Interpratation, of the bible at least, is to be of a metphorical nature. You are not supposed to focus on the actual event but the meaning that you are meant to get from it. It's when things start to be taken literally that problems arise. For one you have to take the times, or even your location, in to consideration before you can fully grasp any situation. What was acceptable or common practice 2000 years ago or even 100 may be unnaceptable in the present. Times have changed as well as culture and I for one believe it is more important to take what you can out of a story and what it means rather than focusing on the action or literal interpration.
It does us no good to argue amongst ourselves on who's religion is worse or better. Theology is meant to give people hope and faith that things can be better that we ourselves can be better and to inspire to live our lives in a way that benefits not only ourselves but the community around us. I think that message gets lost a long the way many times and when it comes to practice many times falls short. I believe when people tell you that God forgives all sins it just means that you may falter and make mistakes but rather then give up know that you can get past those mistakes and move on with your life.
Another thing that you may already realize is that no one is perfect and no organization is either. It doesn't mean you should let anyone off the hook but it also doesn't mean you should condemn the entire group for the actions of a few and that goes for any religion or any type of group. I don't ask that anyone change or believe I just think that people should have respect for someone else's views and beliefs and i'm also not saying that religion exempts you from antyhing either so yea.
Basically though I think Elanabelle is just trying to speak on a topic that is felt to be important to him/her but I may disagree how they went about it. It's a lot easiar to get people to favor your cause if your not so dismissing of a certain group. killing children is definitely a grave matter but i'd try a more diplomatic approach to get people to take a greater notice in the issue at hand.
I agree with you. If the OP hadn't taken such a condesending attitude towards everyone of one faith I would see this as an issue s/he was interested in. Instead I see it as a finger pointing contest on who is the better person/people/religion especially considering this is happening in Western countries too.
By Wombat 2011-01-18 14:26:08
Bahamut.Milamber said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Milamber said:
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
That's infanticide; as in the homicide of an infant, solely based on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to enslave people themselves. It merely states that after killing all of the first born sons of an entire population, God chose this course of action to end those lives.
God, being omnipotent, could have just... Oh, I don't know, teleported them to another area of the world? Maybe just freed them?
Or just decided "Ah *** it, I'm being lazy today. I've ignored my worshippers for a few hundred years while they have been slaves, so rather than delivering them to a better place, I'll just kill a bunch of babies."
Did I say that God's actions were correct? I'm in no place to make such an assertion one way or the other.
Either way, the Bible is meant to teach people lessons about life and God. Whether this story actually took place or not is up in the air from a historical stand point.
@Kara
I'm sorry if I seem upset, I just happen to be feeling a little impatient today.
It's really nothing personal =D
I can't be mad at you for taking these verses out of context when many Christians take the Bible out of context quite a bit more than anyone else does.
Yes, but exactly what is this supposed to teach?
Revenge is sweet/best served cold?
Do onto others?
The victor writes the history?
From the Egyptian point of view, God would be acting in a "Satanic" manner.
Also, exactly what does this teach about God?
I'd say this is about how people who are unrepentant about the evil they bring to others, will have evil brought upon themselves.
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2011-01-18 14:31:10
Wombat said: Bahamut.Milamber said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Milamber said:
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
That's infanticide; as in the homicide of an infant, solely based on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to enslave people themselves. It merely states that after killing all of the first born sons of an entire population, God chose this course of action to end those lives.
God, being omnipotent, could have just... Oh, I don't know, teleported them to another area of the world? Maybe just freed them?
Or just decided "Ah *** it, I'm being lazy today. I've ignored my worshippers for a few hundred years while they have been slaves, so rather than delivering them to a better place, I'll just kill a bunch of babies."
Did I say that God's actions were correct? I'm in no place to make such an assertion one way or the other.
Either way, the Bible is meant to teach people lessons about life and God. Whether this story actually took place or not is up in the air from a historical stand point.
@Kara
I'm sorry if I seem upset, I just happen to be feeling a little impatient today.
It's really nothing personal =D
I can't be mad at you for taking these verses out of context when many Christians take the Bible out of context quite a bit more than anyone else does.
Yes, but exactly what is this supposed to teach?
Revenge is sweet/best served cold?
Do onto others?
The victor writes the history?
From the Egyptian point of view, God would be acting in a "Satanic" manner.
Also, exactly what does this teach about God? I'd say this is about how people who are unrepentant about the evil they bring to others, will have evil brought upon themselves.
But then God would be bringing the evil?
By Wombat 2011-01-18 14:31:26
Bahamut.Kara said: @Wombat
Yes I'm feeling a bit impatient today too.....since whenever I get to read people quoting the Qur'an it's how that it always calls for violence and can't be a peaceful religion
All religions have called for violence. My first post was in reference to someone who just pulled some violent quotes out of a book and expect that to prove that one religion > another or people > another people.
I'm not as well versed in interpreting the Qur'an, so I can't defend it; nor do I know if there is anything there to be defended. If I was able to, I would do so.
People picking on religious texts cheeses me off a bit because it's presumptuous to think you can understand all of what a faith stands for by picking out a few sentences from an ancient book. Faiths (particularly ones that are developed into mainstream religions) are far too complex and multifaceted for such treatment to be anything short of silly.
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2011-01-18 14:32:42
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
Wombat said:
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
So it's ok to kill children as long as a) it's to right a wrong and b) God is doing it.
Also Psalms 137:9 refers to the city of Babylon and the Jews are not free to worship their God.
Psalm 137
8. O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction,
happy is he who repays you
for what you have done to us—
9. he who seizes your infants
and dashes them against the rocks.
....
He shall be reputed happy, prosperous, and highly commendable, who shall destroy Babylon.
reference
Ya, thats not calling for baby killing at all.
How would you feel about a nation who burned your holy city, holy temple and a large portion of your population to the ground; only to finish by taking the "usable" portion of the population and exiling them from your homeland to their capital to work for them?
This Psalm is a plea to God from such an exiled individual. These are his words, saying that he wants the same evil to be visited upon Babylon in retribution.
It's not right. It's incomplete theology. It was spawned from anger and malice. It is an example of human desperation and what we are capable of desiring when we have been deeply hurt.
See I understand the despair and the want for revenge but I do not see the advocating of killing of innocents. To me that is beyond wrong and I would never wish for that. The death/revenge of those who've wronged me, yes. The death of their children especially in such a brutal way, no.
And as you or someone else said these stories are not supposed to be taken literally, but they are to some people. To some practicing Christians these stories are the literal truth.
This is the same as in the Islam faith where passages are not to be a literal interruption but some people believe them to be.
By Wombat 2011-01-18 14:33:50
Bahamut.Milamber said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Milamber said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Milamber said:
Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Wombat said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Cossack said:
Its a religion of peace, if you don't like it they'll cut your *** head off.
These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting.
"... at midnight the Lord smote
all the first born in the land of
Egypt, from the first born of the
pharaoh... unto the first born of
the captive that was in the dungeon;
and all the first born cattle"
-- Exodus 12:29
"...They shall fall by the sword:
their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child
shall be ripped up!"
-- Hosea 13:16
"Their children shall be dashed
to pieces before their eyes!
There houses spoiled, and their
wives raped...Dash the young men
to pieces...have no pity on the
fruit of the womb, the children
shall not be spared"
-- Isaiah 13:16-18
“Happy shall he be, that taketh
and dasheth thy little ones against
the stones.” --Psalms 137:9
It's easy to take things out of context and make it sound evil, or like it's promoting something it isn't. Clearly you don't understand the history behind any of these verse, why the writers are saying what they are saying, or who they are saying it to and about.
None of these examples encourage the killing of children when read in context.
You must be upset with the person who quoted the Qur'an too? Since I guess you missed the entire point of the "These are from the bible and the torah on killing babies. Might as well be equal in our quoting."
How is it out of context to quote Exodus 12:29 on God killing the first born? Guess it must be metaphorical.
God killed the first born sons of Egypt after Pharaoh repeatedly refused to release the Israelites from a slavery that lasted hundreds of years.
That's slavery; as in forced labor, rape, murder (including children), etc. for several hundred years, based solely on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to kill children themselves. It merely states that after nine previous warnings, God chose this course of action to end that slavery.
That's infanticide; as in the homicide of an infant, solely based on their ethnicity.
Either way, in no way does this encourage anyone to enslave people themselves. It merely states that after killing all of the first born sons of an entire population, God chose this course of action to end those lives.
God, being omnipotent, could have just... Oh, I don't know, teleported them to another area of the world? Maybe just freed them?
Or just decided "Ah *** it, I'm being lazy today. I've ignored my worshippers for a few hundred years while they have been slaves, so rather than delivering them to a better place, I'll just kill a bunch of babies."
Did I say that God's actions were correct? I'm in no place to make such an assertion one way or the other.
Either way, the Bible is meant to teach people lessons about life and God. Whether this story actually took place or not is up in the air from a historical stand point.
@Kara
I'm sorry if I seem upset, I just happen to be feeling a little impatient today.
It's really nothing personal =D
I can't be mad at you for taking these verses out of context when many Christians take the Bible out of context quite a bit more than anyone else does.
Yes, but exactly what is this supposed to teach?
Revenge is sweet/best served cold?
Do onto others?
The victor writes the history?
From the Egyptian point of view, God would be acting in a "Satanic" manner.
Also, exactly what does this teach about God? I'd say this is about how people who are unrepentant about the evil they bring to others, will have evil brought upon themselves.
But then God would be bringing the evil?
I believe I was suggesting that the evil is a natural result of evil. That is, they brought it upon themselves.
Or perhaps, I could go more cliche and say: God didn't bring evil, he brought judgment.
Good theology would probably dictate that both of these things are true.
[+]
Sylph.Oddin
サーバ: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1756
By Sylph.Oddin 2011-01-18 14:35:51
People suck. End of story.
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2011-01-18 14:37:18
Sylph.Oddin said: People suck. End of story.
People have used religion as an excuse to kill for thousands of years and they will continue to do so.
Yep, people suck. End story.
[+]
Ramuh.Vinvv
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2011-01-18 14:39:15
Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Oddin said: People suck. End of story.
People killed for thousands of years for almost any reason and they will continue to do so.
Yep, people suck. End story. FTFY
[+]
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2011-01-18 14:40:59
Ramuh.Vinvv said: Bahamut.Kara said: Sylph.Oddin said: People suck. End of story.
People killed for thousands of years for almost any reason and they will continue to do so.
Yep, people suck. End story. FTFY
true.
[+]
Cerberus.Nutt
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 264
By Cerberus.Nutt 2011-01-18 14:41:42
If there were NO religion, people would still kill thousands just for the fun of it.
Stop blaming religion when people are able to make their own decisions.
[+]
Ramuh.Vinvv
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2011-01-18 14:43:25
Cerberus.Nutt said: If there were NO religion, people would still kill thousands just for the fun of it.
Stop blaming religion when people are able to make their own decisions. I dunno if it's always just for the fun of it.
You can make a multitude of reasons to kill another person, sadly none of them are really all that good.(my opinion)
[+]
Cerberus.Nutt
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 264
By Cerberus.Nutt 2011-01-18 14:48:33
Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Cerberus.Nutt said: If there were NO religion, people would still kill thousands just for the fun of it. Stop blaming religion when people are able to make their own decisions. No you can blame religion for spreading hate, murder, and intolerance. It does not matter if there is an untold amount of those in the world. christianity and islam (since those are the topic at the moment) blatantly spread them and add to them.
Are you saying there would be less hate, murder, and intolerance if these religions did not exist?
[+]
Sylph.Oddin
サーバ: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1756
By Sylph.Oddin 2011-01-18 14:52:32
There's no denying that religion has led to innumerable amounts of death. You'd be stupid to think otherwise. However even if there wasn't religion, killing wouldn't stop. It may not come on a grander scale but it would still persist. Wars have been fought over territory, resources; hell even fought over ideas. There's no mistaking the cause is human inadequacy but religion was the tool used to justify the killings. Even without religion, another tool would just be substituted in its place.
Fairy.Spence
サーバ: Fairy
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23779
By Fairy.Spence 2011-01-18 14:54:53
I'm sure the fear of going to hell has deterred a fair number of murders over time.
Cerberus.Nutt
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 264
By Cerberus.Nutt 2011-01-18 14:56:47
Man has the ability to make his own decisions regardless of what's in The Bible or any other Ancient Book. Man is NOT blameless. I don't believe that people should be so quick to blame God for things that are their own fault.
Link
Time for another log on the fire of debate about Islamic practices and culture.
So, apparently in Pakistan, people are shunned if they have a child "out of wedlock", and adultery can be punishable with death.
But .... it's apparently acceptable to murder newborn infants, or abandon them at the dump?
How does a culture develop in this way, really?
I know I've read stories about the Ancient Spartans abandoning ill newborns. But this Islam-based practice in Pakistan sounds like women will abandon or kill even healthy newborn children, solely to avoid social persecution for being a "sinner"?
How is the heartless, soulless act of killing an innocent and helpless infant not also considered a vile sin?
|
|