Also doesn't imply that God destroyed Sodom because of homosexuality.
Hey Starr, what is wrong with orgies?
Not for me to say, read the scriptures. I'm poly-sexual and go to an S&M dungeon once-twice a month, inb4 "liar" etc from virginfags and other *** who hate to accept my superiority. I am not a great Christian in myself but I am a brilliant Christian apologetic, theologian and preacher because I understand and can explain scriptures to those who need help to understand. If I can get one person into Heaven and myself forever burn in Hell then I could not be happier as I am very humble really, but I wish you guys would wake up and accept the reality that is God.
Also doesn't imply that God destroyed Sodom because of homosexuality.
Hey Starr, what is wrong with orgies?
Not for me to say, read the scriptures. I'm poly-sexual and go to an S&M dungeon once-twice a month, inb4 "liar" etc from virginfags and other *** who hate to accept my superiority. I am not a great Christian in myself but I am a brilliant Christian apologetic, theologian and preacher because I understand and can explain scriptures to those who need help to understand. If I can get one person into Heaven and myself forever burn in Hell then I could not be happier as I am very humble really, but I wish you guys would wake up and accept the reality that is God.
Doesn't make the points I raise any less relevant, I'm sure it makes them baseless and worthless to some idiots but in reality it does not at all, I still want people to try and defend their uninformed, biased opinions for my lulz.
I really am not and I did not pick up any angry tone in that hilarious post, but perhaps now you see it from my side :P
I knew you were a hypocrite, but now it is just laughable. Certainly you do not have to practice everything you preach, but if you are like that then do not even bother preaching.
I'm not a hypocrite. Again, I would be a hypocrite if I was telling you to and not to do something based on my opinion or belief then myself not doing it. It is not hypocritical to tell people that they should get their guidance from the scriptures, knowing I need to do so myself, but myself not following them as well as I could.
Just because it is in the old testament does not mean it is not apart of the bible. Most Christian churchs still use the old testament in their teachings.....Genesis is old testment yet for some reason it is still used to preach intelligent design.
old is still very relevant for those who give a rats *** about Jesus
Matthew 5:
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
I really am not and I did not pick up any angry tone in that hilarious post, but perhaps now you see it from my side :P
I knew you were a hypocrite, but now it is just laughable. Certainly you do not have to practice everything you preach, but if you are like that then do not even bother preaching.
I'm not a hypocrite. Again, I would be a hypocrite if I was telling you to and not to do something based on my opinion or belief then myself not doing it. It is not hypocritical to tell people that they should get their guidance from the scriptures, knowing I need to do so myself, but myself not following them as well as I could.
Conversation in my mind!
Starr: Get your guidance from the scriptures.
Spicy: Do you?
Starr: No, but I know I need to.
Spicy: What a nonhypocritical statement.
Starr: Yeah I know, here, hold my beer.
Spicy: Okay my wise friend.
spicy I prefer liquor but I'll drink a beer for this. or three.
Also doesn't imply that God destroyed Sodom because of homosexuality.
Hey Starr, what is wrong with orgies?
Not for me to say, read the scriptures. I'm poly-sexual and go to an S&M dungeon once-twice a month, inb4 "liar" etc from virginfags and other *** who hate to accept my superiority. I am not a great Christian in myself but I am a brilliant Christian apologetic, theologian and preacher because I understand and can explain scriptures to those who need help to understand. If I can get one person into Heaven and myself forever burn in Hell then I could not be happier as I am very humble really, but I wish you guys would wake up and accept the reality that is God.
Was very drunk, makes me laugh too but erm I was using humble as in I put people before myself in situations where only one of us could benefit, but I'm not humble in that I don't value other people above myself because I don't lie. Also meant to say poly amorous there not poly-sexual which means I have sex with people of both genders.
Was very drunk, makes me laugh too but erm I was using humble as in I put people before myself in situations where only one of us could benefit,
I think the word you are looking for here is selfless. That isn't what humble means, in any sense of the word.
Cerberus.Starr said:
but I'm not humble in that I don't value other people above myself because I don't lie.
These words don't make sense when you combine them like this. What are you trying to say?
Cerberus.Starr said:
Also meant to say poly amorous there not poly-sexual which means I have sex with people of both genders.
Polyamorous means you practice having more than one intimate relationship at a given time, and everyone participating knows it.
Polysexual means you don't really think that genders can be defined into a set pair of genders, find yourself interested in the spectrum.
Essentially, they mean you believe in keeping your options (among other things) open. Just in slightly different ways.
But again, your meaning is unclear. Are you polyamorous or polysexual?
Link Time for another log on the fire of debate about Islamic practices and culture. So, apparently in Pakistan, people are shunned if they have a child "out of wedlock", and adultery can be punishable with death. But .... it's apparently acceptable to murder newborn infants, or abandon them at the dump? How does a culture develop in this way, really? I know I've read stories about the Ancient Spartans abandoning ill newborns. But this Islam-based practice in Pakistan sounds like women will abandon or kill even healthy newborn children, solely to avoid social persecution for being a "sinner"? How is the heartless, soulless act of killing an innocent and helpless infant not also considered a vile sin?
Hey lets just repeat mindless drible that's been said a thousand times over and claim we're having a real intellectual thought. I guess it's easier to pretend.
Time for another log on the fire of debate about Islamic practices and culture.
So, apparently in Pakistan, people are shunned if they have a child "out of wedlock", and adultery can be punishable with death.
But .... it's apparently acceptable to murder newborn infants, or abandon them at the dump?
How does a culture develop in this way, really?
I know I've read stories about the Ancient Spartans abandoning ill newborns. But this Islam-based practice in Pakistan sounds like women will abandon or kill even healthy newborn children, solely to avoid social persecution for being a "sinner"?
How is the heartless, soulless act of killing an innocent and helpless infant not also considered a vile sin?