LOL. <(O.o)> Got a friend pist off at me today while I was jogging.
I had this crazy idea and called my friend at work and telling him my thought and now he said it's stuck in his head and can't concentrate on his work.
It's just an idea, no science behind it.
What if the solar system was made backwards.
-It's weird that there's less terrestrial planets out beyond asteroid belt. But yet in Jupiter's orbit and then beyond Pluto, there's asteroids. (However, there's dwarf planet size moons around Jupiter and Saturn).
Well, yes and no. Planet formation is still not entirely well understood, and to say that just a few different forces are in play would be putting it mildly.
Quote:
-If the Sun was to combust it would of burned hotter in the beginning and could have generated higher gravity fields which could of pulled planets toward it and burn off any gases.
No, it wouldn't. Gravity is not associated with energy output, but with mass. Now, you could argue that a more massive sun would have higher luminosity, and higher gravity, but you would also have a higher outward flux. Gravity is a really weak force compared to pretty much everything else.
Quote:
-Would it make more sense planets forming with less gravity farther out then smashing at higher speeds? Earth moves at 107,300 km/h (67,062 MPH).
Not really, the gravity from the sun would have less of an impact than the other particles nearby. (It's how you get planet formation in the first place)
Quote:
-Like Saturn, it has ice rings around it which would of explained water on Earth. (Saturn is said to be made up of what a sun could be, so at one time the sun before igniting could of had ice rings).
Arguably it is possible, possibly likely that some ring formation occured prior to acquiring enough mass to ignite. The same statement made for Saturn can be applied to all the gas giants.