Fenrir.Schutz said:
Bill O'Reilly sounds so amazingly centerist and fair-minded when counterposed against Ann Coulter. :p (To his credit, I do find he portrays himself as the most balanced and open-minded person on all of FOX News...but of course that isn't that amazing a thing since Alan Colmes left FOX, LOL.) :p
But I suppose that if...
* Radiation therapy can destroy cancer cells or shrink hyperactive thyroid glands, and
* Radioactive alteration of DNA prompts mutations, which are a cornerstone of the evolutionary process, and
* Hi-Energy Gamma Radiation was responsible for turning mild-mannered Bruce Banner into the Incredible Hulk
...then excessive radioactive exposures might just be what we need to stay healthy. ^^ But in a "X-Men" sort of healthy, and not a "Hills Have Eyes" sort of healthy. :p
The problem here is that not all factors are being looked at.
*Radiation therapy is done in controlled doses and specifically targets the cancer or the thyroid. Even then, it does still, in a sense, poison the body that's why people have to take breaks between and they lose their hair and they are constantly tired and such.
*I'm skipping a point for a moment.
*That is a work of fiction. I'm sorry, you're more likely to have your skin start peeling off and bones wear away and if you do somehow miracuously survive and ...
*have children, they are more likely to be mutated and deformed, some to the point of not being able to survive, let alone function very well. Just look at some of the Chernobyl babies. That's what excessive levels of radiation will do. Not give you x-men powers. -.-
Yes. That would be cool and maybe a slightly higher amount of radiation isn't so bad, I don't know. What I do know is that what that Ann Coulter lady seems to be saying is wrong. There is a point where there is too much radiation, one should not go hang around nuclear disaster sites, thinking it's good for you.