Just to be clear, the point of this discussion is to figure out which WS that "non career" thieves should be using, right? Because we really have to define what that means if this whole thing is meant to be meaningful. I don't really like the term because it will likely mean "whatever seems to hard to get" to everyone, regardless of the level of their THF's gear.
Is no Khepri what it means to be a non-career THF? Having no 99 weapons? Having no empy or relic? No NNI gear? I don't know where you watn to draw the line.
Obviously this stuff matters a lot when comparing weaponskills since when we say "this weaponskill is better than that", the goal is to compare under realistic conditions while gearing as optimally as possible.
For example, looking at Ig-Alima with all of its level correction and not adding at least Stalwart's and Braver's is a ridiculous case. DPS drops to something nonsensical like
10 and one can hardly make a decent comparison in such a range.
Ignoring this whole "what's the definition of a non-career" THF problem, I tried to set up a reasonable scenario for Qilin with gear to make each weaponskill as strong as possible in this context.
So, for me, that means:
Mithra
DNC subjob to help with procs
RCB
STR12, DEX12, Crit 5%, Dagger 16, TA 5, AC 1, Exent 5/5
SA and TA are "None" to get the best unstacked WS numbers
No Berserk, no aggressor
This is Voidwatch, so Stalwart's and Braver's are included
Using Twash90/Coruscanti and...
This set for Exenterator:
and this set for Evisceration:
Exenterator is favored by 7.5% in WS damage (1554 vs 1445). If we add Blood Rage or Rogue's Roll on top of this (Rogue's Roll being highly unrealistic), then Evisc finally overtakes Exenterator. Boost-DEX would help Evisc as well but you won't be receiving that either. Champion's is another buff that will benefit Evisceration but even if you're able to full-time it, Exent should still barely edge it out (to the exent that I'd call it a wash).
Like Deci said, having 30 DEX on daggers is about as good as it gets for Evisceration (not to mention the crit rate boost on Coruscanti), but additionally, the value of crits goes up as your melee pdif gets crappier, so it's no surprise you see Evisc performing well on higher level targets if you are lacking standard melee buffs. This brings back the question of what are realistic buffs for a THF across all contexts but that's another debate.
Then we can make a few changes that will favor Exenterator rather than Evisceration in this context:
- Mandau/Pugi instead of Twashtar/Coruscanti
- Capped attack however you like (Chaos Roll, Berserk, or whatever)
- Swap most unnecessary attack-heavy gear to pump up WSC
Then the result is Exenterator ahead by 20% at 1997 vs Evisceration at 1656
I have to run if you guys want to try to debug discrepancies but I was pretty explicit so you should be able to reproduce all of this. My overall point is that, while Evisc is obviously awesome inside Abyssea, it's only going to do well outside if the buffs very heavily favor it. Even in the case where buffs/daggers were mostly to the advantage of Evisceration, Exenterator's still right there with it and even winning most of the time (unless Blood Rage or Rogue's Roll), yet in cases that favor Exenterator, we see substantial boost in WS damage.
This is why I'm comfortable saying Exent > Evisc as a general statement. If you really find yourself as /DNC without Berserk while wielding Twash/Corsucanti and with a bunch of crit buffs but awful attack buffs, then go for Evisc by all means, but I think we have to consider realistic buff setups.
We can do this over again if anyone wants to throw out a more clear definition of what it means to be a non-career THF, but any choice is going to be a bit arbitrary since what's difficult for one person may be easy for another and vice versa.
Apologies in advance if I missed something silly while drawing these comparisons but I'm rushing because I have to head out for a few hours. Be back later tonight.