not going to go back and forth with you, as you definitely know more about cor than me... but I wouldn't use mkris cos I would use a multiattack build if I was going to melee...
also I can get fighters/chaos on dd and then tact on myself (leaving me with chaos/tact) its not that hard...
if you're really going to melee cos "bullets are too expensive" but buy an mkris to melee then why even use last stand (zomg TWO bullets)
my word means nothing tho and everyone has their own playstyle
You totally skipped all the post after that one and missed points entirely - -
1. I did not suggest this way because "it's cheaper". I suggested it because it dealt more dmg with pages of maths, cheaper is just icing on the cake. Why would anyone want to spend more money to deal less dmg?
2. If I'm using spreadsheet correctly, single hit weapon with multi-attack build seems TP slower especially when your 2nd roll isn't DA. Mkris avg 1.9 attacks per round, Aluh with 3% QA, 6% TA, 22% DA(my usual multi-attack stacking TP set on BLU) avg 1.4. Mkris with the set I posted generates 7.3 TP a hit and 14 hit to 100 TP starting from 0. Aluh is 5.7 with 11 STP and 18 hit to 100 starting from 0.
On higher tier NM like prov, 1h DPS is bad, getting higher DPS and 60 more dmg with last stand shouldn't beat 1 extra 3~4k last stand if you can do 1 more last stand with faster TP speed in a zerg fight. I've used Aluh for Prov zerg once, total melee dmg was only 3.5k(or a few hundred less I think) while Mkris dmg was often 1k~1.5k, which you can easily make up with 1~2 extra WS.
If you better reason/suggestion than my idea, then go ahead, I'm easily convinced if there are another way that worked better. But not without math/proper reasoning.
3. I never asked ppl don't do 3 rolls, heck I almost always do 4 rolls if I'm spamming WF and always 3 rolls with last stand. Idk why you keep mentioning doing 3 rolls is awesome - -
4. If you think your word "means nothing" and everyone have different play style and should play how they want to, then don't spread misleading info when other ppl asked questions to improve job performance -.- The one who asked question was clearly seeking better way to play the job. If you think other ppl's suggestion is bad and you have better one, then back up your argument with reasoning or math, but "everyone have their own play style" isn't reasoning and pretty pointless. I don't care about how you want to DD, I only care about looking for better way to DD.