Because I said so, in the very first line
Let's see here. Let's first assume capped pdif/fStr/everything
If I'm using max and you're using average, there's no mystery why your numbers are lower than mine.
I also said I was using my own personal set, and I don't have moonshade.
And I'm hume.
Also, I knew you were eventually going to venture into the realm of arguing about variables. I have little interest in talking about variables, precisely because they are variables. There's no value in arguing about something that changes every time you engage on something new.
What we should be doing is saying, "under these circumstances, here are the results". And that's exactly what I've done. I've stated that these are the numbers you will get if you max out pdif/fStr/etc.
Even if you disagree, with relevance is it?
I stated that, given maxed out fStr/pdif, these are the numbers you get.
You respond by saying my numbers are too high, then proceeded to redo the math by using average numbers instead.
While your math is correct, what exactly are you trying to show here?
How does this change the fact that, when you use maxed out numbers, those numbers I gave are the results you will get?
It seems like you're trying to argue something that I'm not.