|
Random Politics & Religion #00
By fonewear 2014-08-26 10:51:05
I need an American flag T shirt that is made in China.
[+]
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-08-26 10:51:47
I need an American flag T shirt that is made in China. With 39 or 52 stars on it too.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 10:53:41
Crazy Horse and St. Ides were the malt liquors of choice while I was in college.
Then St. Ides started getting sold in six-packs, which led to the St. Ides Six-Pack Challenge, which led to a lot of belligerance and broken furniture followed by hugs and belting out Journey songs.
Edit: Which was of course followed by vomitting, because you just drank 96 ounces of vile fermented cat piss.
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6558
By Odin.Zicdeh 2014-08-26 10:55:23
King Cobra 40's right from the paper bag.
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2014-08-26 10:55:26
I can't find em' on google. maybe they didn't make them for very long, or I subsequently drank the correct name out of my memory banks.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 10:56:07
So many people in this thread need to learn how to shop.
Uh-huh.
Give me your guidelines, please.
And be sure to include instructions as to how to magically produce local businesses that stock what I desire.
online shop and get them to deliver or store pickup
I do shop online, but that still means I'm supporting Amazon or some such distributor on some level (many, many small businesses run through Amazon affiliations), or otherwise not shopping truly locally.
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-08-26 10:57:27
So many people in this thread need to learn how to shop.
Uh-huh.
Give me your guidelines, please.
And be sure to include instructions as to how to magically produce local businesses that stock what I desire.
online shop and get them to deliver or store pickup
I do shop online, but that still means I'm supporting Amazon or some such distributor on some level (many, many small businesses run through Amazon affiliations), or otherwise not shopping truly locally. What's wrong with Amazon anyway?
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 10:59:52
So many people in this thread need to learn how to shop.
Uh-huh.
Give me your guidelines, please.
And be sure to include instructions as to how to magically produce local businesses that stock what I desire.
online shop and get them to deliver or store pickup
I do shop online, but that still means I'm supporting Amazon or some such distributor on some level (many, many small businesses run through Amazon affiliations), or otherwise not shopping truly locally. What's wrong with Amazon anyway?
Depends who you ask.
They've certainly put a lot of book/music/movie stores out business, but most of those bigger chains had already in turn wiped out many local providers of the same content, so turnabout is fair play to a degree.
*shrug*
They're not the greatest of employers to all of their warehouse personal -- you can find some serious horror stories out there -- but I know people who work there and seem pretty happy, so...
like I said. Depends who you ask.
I'm just assuming someone who pushes shopping locally wouldn't care for Amazon.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 11:14:43
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-08-26 11:14:53
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Once you hit malt liquor, you're on the path to destruction.
awesome. I started with malt liquor 16 some odd years ago. anyone else ever drink those 'reserves'?
Steel Reserve, Colt 45, Four Loko, St. Ides, Crazy Horse... all approved by my local alcoholics. Drinking paint thinner doesn't matter when you're drunk off your *** with your pants off on the corner.
Cerberus.Pleebo
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2014-08-26 11:26:53
I can't wait for Kara and Pleebo to come here and give their own little and incorrect definitions of subsidies and tax credits. Without providing basis for those definitions either.
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-08-26 11:27:07
Isn't it obvious?
Abuse of one drug directly correlates to abuse of another drug.
All people want is to see their hands wave back at them.
Let them, for all I care. As long as they don't force their products on me, and as long as they don't drive while intoxicated, it doesn't affect me one bit.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 11:36:21
Isn't it obvious?
Abuse of one drug directly correlates to abuse of another drug.
All people want is to see their hands wave back at them.
Let them, for all I care. As long as they don't force their products on me, and as long as they don't drive while intoxicated, it doesn't affect me one bit.
It's also significantly harder to overdose on marijuana, however. Like...really, really hard.
It's really not just about abuse. A lot of people are prescribed opiod pain medications for very serious pain issues.
Which can come into play when people -- especially older people with failing memories -- accidentally take too many of their Vicodin or Percocet or Norco. This happens far more often than you'd suspect and it really is unintentional.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 11:38:18
Richard M. Nixon was the one behind the original design of what is now the ACA.
And this matters why? A piece of crap legislation is a piece of crap legislation no matter who came up with it or when. Because when it fails, the liberals can deny it in entirity.
Never mind that not one single Republican voted for the legislation.
Jet is under the delusion that Republicans voted for the ACA. They did, in the 90's.
and they basically made it, go figure. I'm sorry, I didn't realize that a piece of legislation that was started and enacted in less than a 2 year span, which first was brought into play in 2009, was available in the 1990s.
I'll let you think that one a little bit, and maybe you can understand your foolishness.
Because you couldn't be more wrong, on both counts. When did debate start for the legislation that became PPACA? It certainly wasn't before Obama was president, because that's his brain child.
Last I checked, the presidents in the 90's were Bush Sr. and Clinton. Heck, Obama wasn't even in the Senate then. Well, he wasn't in the Senate for most of the 2000's, as he was only "present" there most of the time.
But since you like to rewrite history, no matter what I say will change the "truth" in your mind....
Oh but it isn't his "brain child" and a large chunk, especially the insurance mandate was all from the "right" look into it, you may learn something.
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2014-08-26 11:41:01
It's also significantly harder to overdose on marijuana, however. Like...really, really hard.
it's more or less impossible. I stuck a goldfish in a bong while it was being used for over an hour, & he was just fine. I then tried the same thing on another fish, just to make sure the first one wasn't the keith richards of fish or some ***.
My 1 anecdotal experiment is all the proof I'll ever need.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 11:42:01
Solar Roadways just pulled this ***for a cool mil or so, on top of whatever they stole from Indiegogo donors. What you talkin' about son?
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 11:42:57
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »KN just doing his part as an accountant. This is the kind of transparent *** that profession thrives on, three left turns isn't really one right turn, but you end up going the same way. Taking 3 lefts is an inefficient way of going right. Accountants thrive on efficiency. Mythbusters busted this myth.
At least in terms of deliverance for goods. Mythbusters are hack "scientists" who couldn't properly apply nullifying a set of variables if their lives depended on it, shitty science for TV.
Bill Nye or gtfo!
(seriously all they do is come up with a reason to blow something up...)
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 11:48:57
Because liberals have no problem calling the products of the other subsidized industries subsidized products, but suddenly when it's used in conjunction with medical procedures it's just "insurance coffers" paying for it, not subsidies.
For starters is has nothing to do with being liberal or not.
Secondly because it's not, do you know how insurance works?
Those other companies sell something, that's between you and them, the insurance companies are paying for your medical coverage, which is between you and the doctor. Quite frankly they should just rewrite the law so they don't even know what the procedures are, rewrite the law to where when somebody has to pay a hospital bill, it's only from one place at the hospital, not each department they went to, or the private practice that operates out of the hospital (contracts, woo). Part of the medical costs are due to the way the system operates, and is billed, hell they just updated the medical coding system, and now there's a million and one new ways to charge people more for the same ***. They're required to charge people the most they can, go figure.
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 11:52:12
If one tried to overdose from Marijuana they'd most likely die from lack of oxygen killing their brain (hello old experiments that said marijuana kills braincells).
You'd basically have to pump it into somebody from them to consume enough.
Now if you're talking like thc butter or hash, I'm sure in concentrate it may be possible, and maybe the vapor form, but you'd have a hard time finding somebody who wants to waste all their pot, when a little goes a long way in concentrate.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 11:59:38
I said "really, really hard", didn't I?
Yeesh. You people are so *** literal today.
Speaking of stoners, to use a Mitch Hedberg joke:
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2014-08-26 12:00:09
If one tried to overdose from Marijuana they'd most likely die pass out from lack of oxygen killing their brain (hello old experiments that said marijuana kills braincells).
agreed.
You'd basically have to pump it into somebody from them to consume enough.
I think that's about the only way.
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 12:01:30
probably should have said "for them" gah, still waking up, damn my flipped schedule
Bismarck.Bloodrose
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-08-26 12:02:01
Richard M. Nixon was the one behind the original design of what is now the ACA.
And this matters why? A piece of crap legislation is a piece of crap legislation no matter who came up with it or when. Because when it fails, the liberals can deny it in entirity.
Never mind that not one single Republican voted for the legislation.
Jet is under the delusion that Republicans voted for the ACA. They did, in the 90's.
and they basically made it, go figure. I'm sorry, I didn't realize that a piece of legislation that was started and enacted in less than a 2 year span, which first was brought into play in 2009, was available in the 1990s.
I'll let you think that one a little bit, and maybe you can understand your foolishness.
Because you couldn't be more wrong, on both counts. When did debate start for the legislation that became PPACA? It certainly wasn't before Obama was president, because that's his brain child.
Last I checked, the presidents in the 90's were Bush Sr. and Clinton. Heck, Obama wasn't even in the Senate then. Well, he wasn't in the Senate for most of the 2000's, as he was only "present" there most of the time.
But since you like to rewrite history, no matter what I say will change the "truth" in your mind....
Oh but it isn't his "brain child" and a large chunk, especially the insurance mandate was all from the "right" look into it, you may learn something. Wasn't the original model of the PPACA based off the impossibly successful version originally used in Massachusetts by Mitt Romney, essentially leaving him without a platform (which he still could have run on) due to the success it brought to his state during his term as Governor?
Lakshmi.Flavin
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2014-08-26 12:03:26
People so defensive of their weed...
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2014-08-26 12:03:47
Grandma Chanti the Huffpo Hippy said: »So many people in this thread need to learn how to shop.
SORRY we can't all knit our clothes out of leftover hemp!
[+]
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 12:03:47
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »Richard M. Nixon was the one behind the original design of what is now the ACA.
And this matters why? A piece of crap legislation is a piece of crap legislation no matter who came up with it or when. Because when it fails, the liberals can deny it in entirity.
Never mind that not one single Republican voted for the legislation.
Jet is under the delusion that Republicans voted for the ACA. They did, in the 90's.
and they basically made it, go figure. I'm sorry, I didn't realize that a piece of legislation that was started and enacted in less than a 2 year span, which first was brought into play in 2009, was available in the 1990s.
I'll let you think that one a little bit, and maybe you can understand your foolishness.
Because you couldn't be more wrong, on both counts. When did debate start for the legislation that became PPACA? It certainly wasn't before Obama was president, because that's his brain child.
Last I checked, the presidents in the 90's were Bush Sr. and Clinton. Heck, Obama wasn't even in the Senate then. Well, he wasn't in the Senate for most of the 2000's, as he was only "present" there most of the time.
But since you like to rewrite history, no matter what I say will change the "truth" in your mind....
Oh but it isn't his "brain child" and a large chunk, especially the insurance mandate was all from the "right" look into it, you may learn something. Wasn't the original model of the PPACA based off the impossibly successful version originally used in Massachusetts by Mitt Romney, essentially leaving him without a platform (which he still could have run on) due to the success it brought to his state during his term as Governor?
Wasn't a fan of Romney, but I also get the feeling he was having his own strings pulled a few too many ways to make him viable enough even for his own party. He has a history of blowing in the direction the wind is currently headed. But there are at least elements of what you said there that are correct.
Bismarck.Bloodrose
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-08-26 12:04:00
cue the Brian and Stewie "Bag-o-weed" song.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 12:04:22
Oh it originates further back than that, and Mittens couldn't have done that, he wouldn't have rallied up the vitriol from his neocon fanbase.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-08-26 12:05:12
Oh it originates further back than that, and Mittens couldn't have done that, he wouldn't have rallied up the vitriol from his neocon fanbase.
You realize things never get better throwing around the word "neocon", right?
I mean, really.
Never once has it helped.
By Jetackuu 2014-08-26 12:05:37
Wasn't a fan of Romney, but I also get the feeling he was having his own strings pulled a few too many ways to make him viable enough even for his own party. He has a history of blowing in the direction the wind is currently headed. But there are at least elements of what you said there that are correct.
Hence the moniker flip-flip Mittens!
Random Politics & Religion is for topics that aren't thread worthy on their own and do not have their own existing thread.
Rules and Guidelines
Forum Rules and P&R Section Guidelines still apply.
Satire is tolerated.
If your topic covers a story over 6 months old (Watergate, Benghazi, 2012 Election, etc.) post it here.
Discussions on racism, homophobia, transphobia, and the like are allowed, targeted insults based on these will not be tolerated.
Political debates get heated and are meant to be intense, if you take offense to being called or proven wrong, you don't belong here.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen; if you prove you can't handle the criticism you bring upon yourself in this thread, you may be removed from it. You are responsible for what you post.
Along those lines, heat is fine, but sustained, clearly personal hostility is not okay. The personal attack rules still apply. Attack positions, not posters. Failure to adhere to this will result in your removal from the thread.
This thread is NOT the Flame Core.
These rules are subject to change and modification where and when needed.
Random Politics & Religion may be mained or demained depending on the activity within at a Moderator's discretion.
With that out of the way, let the debates begin!
/bow
|
|