|
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
By Bloodrose 2015-09-22 20:32:57
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
An idiotic pipe dream claiming to run every home in America on clean energy in 4 years should make Democrats squirm. She should talk about colonizing Mars with Newt Gingrich, World Peace and a million dollars in every Americans' bank account while she's at it. Oh and a pet Unicorn for every child, Damn it, I want a rainbow Unicorn!
Or better yet... Unikitty!
[+]
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-22 20:35:36
Would be easier to power everything with nuclear, could cut down on the insane amount of coal plants that we have in the US too.
Environmentalists don't like that either probably because it makes too much sense. They let hysteria and irrational fear rule their lives, and ours.
By Jassik 2015-09-22 20:41:34
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Environmentalists don't like that either probably because it makes too much sense. They let hysteria and irrational fear rule their lives, and ours.
Well, the drawbacks to solar/wind are that they are expensive and depend on storage systems that aren't particularly green or efficient. The drawback to nuclear is that half a dozen reactors have had issues (3 catastrophic) in the last 50 years. Nuclear is a lot safer than people think and a lot cleaner than coal, but when it goes bad, it goes VERY bad. They also cost an insane amount to build and nobody wants one near their house. It's really not hard to see why people would be apprehensive about them. Or, you could just paint anyone with concerns as hysteric and irrational, because you don't get your jimmies rustled when people do it to you.
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2015-09-22 20:44:54
Don't mind me, I'm just making conservatives squirm
don't sell the bike shop just yet orville
fbi recovers emails from clinton server
[+]
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-22 21:24:09
How many deaths have been a result of nuclear power in America? The fear is irrational.
More people have been killed by wind turbines.
By Jassik 2015-09-22 21:25:28
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »How many deaths have been a result of nuclear power in America? The fear is irrational.
More people have been killed by wind turbines.
How many times has Obama taken people's guns or declared martial law?
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-22 21:27:39
Changing the subject is lame. You shoukd just stop posting when you are wrong.
[+]
By Jassik 2015-09-22 21:31:37
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Changing the subject is lame. You shoukd just stop posting when you are wrong.
Wrong about what?
 Cerberus.Pleebo
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2015-09-22 21:32:47
4 years isn't too big a stretch. Overly optimistic, perhaps. Solar farms go up very quickly and the profit incentive is there to build them. Have to acquire the land though, which is something the government could directly speed along.
[+]
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-09-23 08:38:20
4 years isn't too big a stretch. Overly optimistic, perhaps. Solar farms go up very quickly and the profit incentive is there to build them. Have to acquire the land though, which is something the government could directly speed along. I would have to agree with Pleebo there.
I own a solar farm and the profit is amazing.
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-09-23 08:51:09
Asura.Floppyseconds said: »Phoenix.Amandarius said: »You shoukd just stop posting when you are wrong.
Let us know how that goes. You should try it.
[+]
[+]
By Jetackuu 2015-09-23 09:15:36
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Environmentalists don't like that either probably because it makes too much sense. They let hysteria and irrational fear rule their lives, and ours.
Well, the drawbacks to solar/wind are that they are expensive and depend on storage systems that aren't particularly green or efficient. The drawback to nuclear is that half a dozen reactors have had issues (3 catastrophic) in the last 50 years. Nuclear is a lot safer than people think and a lot cleaner than coal, but when it goes bad, it goes VERY bad. They also cost an insane amount to build and nobody wants one near their house. It's really not hard to see why people would be apprehensive about them. Or, you could just paint anyone with concerns as hysteric and irrational, because you don't get your jimmies rustled when people do it to you.
Personally I'd be more concerned with the amount of radiation that burning coal releases into the atmosphere. Not to mention the facts of at least 2 of the 3 major incidents, the third I'm nor learned enough on to comment).
I can see why people would be apprehensive about them, but I can also rely on logic and facts instead of raw emotion.
By Jetackuu 2015-09-23 09:18:16
Asura.Floppyseconds said: »Phoenix.Amandarius said: »How many deaths have been a result of nuclear power in America? The fear is irrational.
More people have been killed by wind turbines.
I believe the issue with nuclear power plants are the radioactive wastes and nothing else.
Yeah, and France is already figuring out how to deal with that.
Anyway, the main problem with Nuclear is a public perception from once again, ignorance and irrational fear.
That being said I am a full proponent of nuclear energy, and know with the continued use of it. That it would make advancements and become even better than it is now.
Newer plants are more efficient, less dangerous. We haven't had a new one built since 1990 (construction was started for that one in 73...).
Granted 2 were approved in Georgia, so there's that.
 Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2015-09-23 09:23:17
How many times has Obama taken people's guns or declared martial law?
he's waiting until his second term is up, then he's going appoint himself head commie czar of america, duh.
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-09-23 09:24:22
Well there are proponents of molten salt and thorium reactors but those come with their own.... issues. Like some impressive startup costs and weapons grade byproducts.
Then there's tidal power which hasn't been explored enough or hydrothermal energy.
By Jassik 2015-09-23 09:24:40
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Environmentalists don't like that either probably because it makes too much sense. They let hysteria and irrational fear rule their lives, and ours.
Well, the drawbacks to solar/wind are that they are expensive and depend on storage systems that aren't particularly green or efficient. The drawback to nuclear is that half a dozen reactors have had issues (3 catastrophic) in the last 50 years. Nuclear is a lot safer than people think and a lot cleaner than coal, but when it goes bad, it goes VERY bad. They also cost an insane amount to build and nobody wants one near their house. It's really not hard to see why people would be apprehensive about them. Or, you could just paint anyone with concerns as hysteric and irrational, because you don't get your jimmies rustled when people do it to you.
Personally I'd be more concerned with the amount of radiation that burning coal releases into the atmosphere. Not to mention the facts of at least 2 of the 3 major incidents, the third I'm nor learned enough on to comment).
I can see why people would be apprehensive about them, but I can also rely on logic and facts instead of raw emotion.
People rely of raw emotion all across the spectrum. Try educating them instead of chastising them. Most Americans think of two things when they hear nuclear: meltdown or the Simpsons.
By Jetackuu 2015-09-23 09:27:34
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Environmentalists don't like that either probably because it makes too much sense. They let hysteria and irrational fear rule their lives, and ours.
Well, the drawbacks to solar/wind are that they are expensive and depend on storage systems that aren't particularly green or efficient. The drawback to nuclear is that half a dozen reactors have had issues (3 catastrophic) in the last 50 years. Nuclear is a lot safer than people think and a lot cleaner than coal, but when it goes bad, it goes VERY bad. They also cost an insane amount to build and nobody wants one near their house. It's really not hard to see why people would be apprehensive about them. Or, you could just paint anyone with concerns as hysteric and irrational, because you don't get your jimmies rustled when people do it to you.
Personally I'd be more concerned with the amount of radiation that burning coal releases into the atmosphere. Not to mention the facts of at least 2 of the 3 major incidents, the third I'm nor learned enough on to comment).
I can see why people would be apprehensive about them, but I can also rely on logic and facts instead of raw emotion.
People rely of raw emotion all across the spectrum. Try educating them instead of chastising them. Most Americans think of two things when they hear nuclear: meltdown or the Simpsons.
I'll pass, thanks.
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2015-09-23 09:36:16
I'll bet 10$ Biden gets the democratic nomination!
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-09-23 09:39:21
I thought he wasn't running yet.
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2015-09-23 09:46:37
give it time.
Garuda.Chanti
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11409
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-09-23 10:38:38
Well, the drawbacks to solar/wind are that they are expensive and depend on storage systems that aren't particularly green or efficient.... Where I live we have an inexpensive and green energy storage system. Inexpensive because it already existed and green because its also hydro power.
Its called Banks Lake. Excess electricity is used to pump water 280 ft (85 m) up from lake Roosevelt to Banks Lake where it sits until there is an energy demand. Or an irrigation demand.
But even when water is released for irrigation it goes through power producing turbines.
Asura.Floppyseconds said: »Phoenix.Amandarius said: »You shoukd just stop posting when you are wrong. Let us know how that goes. Yes please do Ama.
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »How many deaths have been a result of nuclear power in America? ... According to this list about two dozen. Russia has had thousands.
But don't worry, some day I am sure we will close that gap.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-23 10:56:18
Russia can't even build a car.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-23 10:57:04
Hey i heard that a leading climate scientist named Pope Francis spoke at the White House today.
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2015-09-23 11:01:30
only three americans died as a direct result of a nuclear accident.
the other people were coincidental.
they were idiots electrocuting themselves, falling down manholes and would have died somewhere else of their own stupidity.
usa
Random Politics & Religion is for topics that aren't thread worthy on their own and do not have their own existing thread.
Rules and Guidelines
Forum Rules and P&R Section Guidelines still apply.
Satire is tolerated.
If your topic covers a story over 6 months old (Watergate, Benghazi, 2012 Election, etc.) post it here.
Discussions on racism, homophobia, transphobia, and the like are allowed, targeted insults based on these will not be tolerated.
Political debates get heated and are meant to be intense, if you take offense to being called or proven wrong, you don't belong here.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen; if you prove you can't handle the criticism you bring upon yourself in this thread, you may be removed from it. You are responsible for what you post.
Along those lines, heat is fine, but sustained, clearly personal hostility is not okay. The personal attack rules still apply. Attack positions, not posters. Failure to adhere to this will result in your removal from the thread.
This thread is NOT the Flame Core.
These rules are subject to change and modification where and when needed.
Random Politics & Religion may be mained or demained depending on the activity within at a Moderator's discretion.
With that out of the way, let the debates begin!
/bow
|
|
