|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Garuda.Chanti
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11402
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-09-30 15:02:11
You are happy that a district court judge denies to toss out contributions from a Super PAC? As possibly being bribes? As in direct opposition to the most specious reasoning in CU?
Oh **** yes.
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-09-30 15:25:35
You are happy that a district court judge denies to toss out contributions from a Super PAC? As possibly being bribes? As in direct opposition to the most specious reasoning in CU?
Oh **** yes. Even though the money never goes to the candidate?
Remember, the senator in this case was soliciting for (your article said so) the Super PAC, they never received the money from the contributions, the Super PAC did. (It's amazing what a word can do to change one's viewpoint)
How is that bribery again?
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-09-30 17:08:16
Quote: The Vatican on Wednesday confirmed that controversial Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis met with Pope Francis last Thursday during his U.S. visit.
Vatican spokesman the Rev. Federico Lombardi said he would not deny that the meeting took place but declined further comment. The pope was in Washington for most of Thursday, flying to New York later in the day. Davis, the clerk of courts for Rowan County, and her husband, Joe Davis, met the pope at the Vatican Embassy in Washington, lawyer Mat Staver told USA TODAY.
Davis made national news after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, claiming it would have conflicted with her Christian beliefs. She spent five nights in jail and was allowed to return to work when she agreed not to interfere with the issuance of licenses. Davis said in a news release that she was humbled by the meeting.
“I never thought I would meet the pope,” she said. “Who am I to have this rare opportunity? I am just a county clerk who loves Jesus and desires with all my heart to serve him. Pope Francis was kind, genuinely caring and very personable.”
Francis touched on the issue during a press conference as he flew back to Rome on Sunday, the Associated Press reported. He told reporters that he wasn’t familiar with details of the case but called conscientious objection a human right, even for government officials.
John Thavis, a former Catholic News Service reporter and author of The Vatican Prophecies, noted that the pope meets with many people during his foreign visits.
"If meeting Kim Davis was the pope's idea, then it has some significance and I think he's sending a message," Thavis said. "But if this was simply another of the meet-and-greet variety of encounters, arranged by someone else, then I think we shouldn't read too much into it."
Mike Huckabee, a former governor of Arkansas now seeking the GOP presidential nominee, tweeted that the pope appreciated that Davis "followed her conscience & convictions."
Huckabee also tweeted: "While the media elites were slobbering b/c @Pontifex commented on climate change, he held a quiet & powerful meeting w/ a humble KY clerk."
The Vatican reached out to Davis through other parties who contacted Staver, the lawyer said. Staver said he was there when a car picked up the Davises to take them to the embassy. The couple was at the embassy for two hours, but the actual visit with the pope lasted 15 minutes, Staver said.
"He held out his hands and he asked Kim to pray," Staver said. "He thanked her for her courage. He said these words, 'Stay strong,' and they embraced and hugged."
The pope spoke in English during the meeting, Staver said.
The pontiff also gave Davis two rosaries that he personally blessed, according to Staver. "Kim's mother and father are both lifelong Catholics so Kim will present those rosaries to them," he said.
Afterward, Davis was "overwhelmed," Staver said.
"She was amazed that she was able to meet with Pope Francis," the lawyer said. "She never imagined in her life that she would meet with the pope and that itself was just an experience that she will never forget."
The meeting "sends a worldwide message that the pope stands on the side of religious freedombigotry," Staver said.
Vatican confirms pope met with Kim Davis
Cerberus.Pleebo
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2015-09-30 17:42:51
Assuming it's true, that's a great way to undo the positive PR he accomplished over his trip. Not that the Church's explicit bigotry is a surprise to anyone, but siding with a person that many people view as a fundamentalist lunatic is pretty low.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 17:48:13
She was probably and correctly introduced to him as a woman imprisoned for her religious beliefs.
*hand shake*
"Pray for me."
End of meeting. Onto the next set of hands.
[+]
Forum Moderator
サーバ: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2015-09-30 17:51:34
Assuming it's true, that's a great way to undo the positive PR he accomplished over his trip. Not that the Church's explicit bigotry is a surprise to anyone, but siding with a person that many people view as a fundamentalist lunatic is pretty low. "Bless you. Stay strong and divorce often, child."
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-09-30 17:55:41
She was imprisoned for knowingly breaking the law, she tried to use religion as an excuse and she failed. I guess this entitles her to a meeting with the Pope. Whatever. Her "crusade" has had no effect on the law.
[+]
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 18:00:43
She was imprisoned because a judge was trying to force her do something against her religious faith. There is no question about this.
Imprisonment was absolutely ridiculous.
If you want anything done to Kim Davis other than being removed from her job through due process, then you are a psycho that likes to hurt people that you disagree with.
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-09-30 18:02:00
Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes. Your insults are amusing tho.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2015-09-30 18:02:10
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »There is no question about this. Yes there is, there's nothing in her religion forbiding issuing marriage licenses.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 18:07:00
Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes. Your insults are amusing tho.
I made no insult. It is fact.
[+]
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 18:08:38
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »There is no question about this. Yes there is, there's nothing in her religion forbiding issuing marriage licenses.
You cannot tell her what her faith is.
As of the Supreme Court ruling though, she is definitely in the wrong line of work.
[+]
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 18:10:00
What crime did she commit other than disobeying a judge's order on religious grounds?
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-09-30 18:15:30
So now we are trying to downplay her crime? Defying a Supreme Court order as a public official sworn to carry out the law is in fact, a crime. There is no grey area, there are no exceptions or in her case, excuses. Notice how no other county clerks anywhere in the country have had a problem. There is nothing special about this woman. Find a new career.
By Xilk 2015-09-30 18:51:56
I understand if they fired her over it, but putting her in jail was absurd.
It also shows the true intent of the gay marriage fiasco: namely its trying to destroy freedom of religion and probably Christianity in particular.
Except the highest law of this land is the Constitution, and any order given by any authority in this country which violates the bill of rights is illegal.
The same rationale you usento attack her could be used to make homosexuality illegal.
By Xilk 2015-09-30 18:54:08
Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes. Your insults are amusing tho. Actually under our constitution religious faith is exactly where law loses its power to impede in our lives.
Garuda.Chanti
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11402
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-09-30 19:08:54
You are happy that a district court judge denies to toss out contributions from a Super PAC? As possibly being bribes? As in direct opposition to the most specious reasoning in CU?
Oh **** yes. Even though the money never goes to the candidate?
Remember, the senator in this case was soliciting for (your article said so) the Super PAC, they never received the money from the contributions, the Super PAC did. (It's amazing what a word can do to change one's viewpoint)
How is that bribery again? It is not necessarily bribery. The judge said it could be held as such and therefore did not dismiss those charges.
The money does not go to the candidate true, but the candidate benefits from the money. We have a quid, is there a pro quo? That is the question the judge will not dismiss out of hand.
But more important, he directly calls into question Robert's specious reasoning that there can never be the appearance of corruption as long as a PAC is involved.
Garuda.Chanti
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11402
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-09-30 19:11:55
Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes.... To fanatics it is.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 19:28:39
It is called "conscientious objection" and there are many cases of it. It is extremely important to have this in America to not force people to doing things against their faith. The law changed while she was in office. Her County needs to find and out and make an accommodation and/or replace her through due process.
The Pope met with prisoners in Philly charged or guilty of crimes the likes of murder and rape. So naturally this means he supports those crimes.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 19:29:54
Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes.... To fanatics it is.
Again, she committed no crime. She just refused to do something opposed to her faith. You know this. Vic knows this.
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-09-30 19:37:58
Back to just denying huh? I know its illegal for a public official to violate the law, hence why she was jailed. Conscientious objection does not apply at all, its just an excuse she tried to use and it failed because it has no relevance. She committed a crime, she was jailed, if her deputies had not agreed to issue licenses she could still be in jail. She has no right to violate the law.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2015-09-30 19:42:04
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Phoenix.Amandarius said: »There is no question about this. Yes there is, there's nothing in her religion forbiding issuing marriage licenses.
You cannot tell her what her faith is.
As of the Supreme Court ruling though, she is definitely in the wrong line of work.
Of course not, but she has told us that it's Christianity and no part of Christianity forbids that.
Not to mention that she can't claim a religious exemption on this. It's not hard to understand why.
That's not ven getting into that she's a complete hypocrite.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 19:47:43
Back to just denying huh? I know its illegal for a public official to violate the law, hence why she was jailed. Conscientious objection does not apply at all, its just an excuse she tried to use and it failed because it has no relevance. She committed a crime, she was jailed, if her deputies had not agreed to issue licenses she could still be in jail. She has no right to violate the law.
What law did she violate?
By Jassik 2015-09-30 19:48:28
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes.... To fanatics it is.
Again, she committed no crime. She just refused to do something opposed to her faith. You know this. Vic knows this.
She defied a court order. Civil servants do not have the right to object on religious grounds. It's literally the same law that grants them religious freedom in the first place.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 20:00:36
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Religious faith is not a excuse to commit crimes.... To fanatics it is.
Again, she committed no crime. She just refused to do something opposed to her faith. You know this. Vic knows this.
She defied a court order. Civil servants do not have the right to object on religious grounds. It's literally the same law that grants them religious freedom in the first place.
There ya go. She defied a court order where a judged ordered her to do something against her faith. Imprisonment for this is absurd and an accomodation should be made until she is replaced. I don't even agree with her but I guess this is the curse that I have of clear thinking a being level headed. I have to argue with people that make emotional, vengeful decisions.
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-09-30 20:04:54
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Back to just denying huh? I know its illegal for a public official to violate the law, hence why she was jailed. Conscientious objection does not apply at all, its just an excuse she tried to use and it failed because it has no relevance. She committed a crime, she was jailed, if her deputies had not agreed to issue licenses she could still be in jail. She has no right to violate the law.
What law did she violate?
Obergefell v. Hodges is the exact order that she was in violation of. Its a crime, there is no grey area. If she doesn't like it she can resign. Jail was the last resort, she was offered the opportunity to let her deputies issues the licenses but she refused to comply so off she went. That was the only accomodation she deserved. Also you playing the victim card is pathetic.
[+]
By Jassik 2015-09-30 20:11:17
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »There ya go. She defied a court order where a judged ordered her to do something against her faith. Imprisonment for this is absurd and an accomodation should be made until she is replaced. I don't even agree with her but I guess this is the curse that I have of clear thinking a being level headed. I have to argue with people that make emotional, vengeful decisions.
She was in contempt of court, she was held in contempt to compel her to comply with the order. The court order wasn't some kind of religious prosecution, it was in response to her refusal to issue marriage licenses, which her position as clerk requires her to do.
There is no ambiguity here. Civil servants do not have the right to object on religious grounds. That would be the state sponsoring a religious institution. If she was earnest in her beliefs, she was welcome to resign her position.
If religious conviction gave a civil servant the right to object to the requirements of their jobs, we'd have mail carriers objecting to delivering letters but still wanting to get a paycheck. If religious conviction gave people the right to defy court orders, we'd have people refusing to repay loans but expecting to be allowed to keep their property.
Sorry, bubba, it doesn't work that way, and no amount of "WAAAAAAH" or internet forum trolling makes it a good idea to grant that level of protection to individual religious beliefs.
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-09-30 20:17:08
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »Back to just denying huh? I know its illegal for a public official to violate the law, hence why she was jailed. Conscientious objection does not apply at all, its just an excuse she tried to use and it failed because it has no relevance. She committed a crime, she was jailed, if her deputies had not agreed to issue licenses she could still be in jail. She has no right to violate the law.
What law did she violate?
Obergefell v. Hodges is the exact order that she was in violation of. Its a crime, there is no grey area. If she doesn't like it she can resign. Jail was the last resort, she was offered the opportunity to let her deputies issues the licenses but she refused to comply so off she went. That was the only accomodation she deserved. Also you playing the victim card is pathetic.
How was I playing the victim card lol? I enjoy arguing with angry, spiteful liberals.
[+]
Random Politics & Religion is for topics that aren't thread worthy on their own and do not have their own existing thread.
Rules and Guidelines
Forum Rules and P&R Section Guidelines still apply.
Satire is tolerated.
If your topic covers a story over 6 months old (Watergate, Benghazi, 2012 Election, etc.) post it here.
Discussions on racism, homophobia, transphobia, and the like are allowed, targeted insults based on these will not be tolerated.
Political debates get heated and are meant to be intense, if you take offense to being called or proven wrong, you don't belong here.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen; if you prove you can't handle the criticism you bring upon yourself in this thread, you may be removed from it. You are responsible for what you post.
Along those lines, heat is fine, but sustained, clearly personal hostility is not okay. The personal attack rules still apply. Attack positions, not posters. Failure to adhere to this will result in your removal from the thread.
This thread is NOT the Flame Core.
These rules are subject to change and modification where and when needed.
Random Politics & Religion may be mained or demained depending on the activity within at a Moderator's discretion.
With that out of the way, let the debates begin!
/bow
|
|