An account balance sheet is a blatantly dishonest way to prove your point.
Wait, what? Seriously? Are you *** kidding?
Look, if you are going to troll this forum, at least do it in a more reasonable way. Stating that a
legal and audited document is a dishonest way to prove a point just shows how incredibly weak your argument really is.
It's adjusted to meet the legal requirement of balance, and it does not report where they pull or push money to make it balance.
Want to prove that? Want to prove to the world that you know more about governmental accounting than a tax accountant who also audits governmental books? Come on, let's here the basis of your assertion.
Oh wait, those words are too hard, let me try this again: Put up or shut up.
Oh, and pro-tip: Those cash balances are reconciled
weekly and are the ending balances as of June 30, 2014. If you want to say otherwise, then prove it by taking classified information and showing it to the public. Mind you, you would be committing fraud and slander at best, and would be looking at a life sentence in a state jail, but go ahead, do it.
Including proposed property tax cuts, Wisconsin will be about 280M in the red by the end of FY2014, which they'll again have to balance out by borrowing from other funding sources.
Care to prove it? Seriously, can you even reconcile a balance sheet or create a budget? Budgets are the easiest thing in the world to do, cause you don't even have to be right, just reasonable. But I don't think you can even reconcile your own checkbook, much less a budget.