The possibility is there, but it's not enough to indict Clinton. Unlike how people are automatically indicting Trump for a few promises he didn't keep....
To be fair, a lot of people here wants to indict Hillary because she breathes air, but I agree with you, Trump is not guilty of anything yet, just like Hillary.
Wait, are you saying that nobody here wants to indict Trump?
I could name a few posters, but their feelings may get hurt and I would get in trouble.
The possibility is there, but it's not enough to indict Clinton. Unlike how people are automatically indicting Trump for a few promises he didn't keep....
To be fair, a lot of people here wants to indict Hillary because she breathes air, but I agree with you, Trump is not guilty of anything yet, just like Hillary.
Wait, are you saying that nobody here wants to indict Trump?
I could name a few posters, but their feelings may get hurt and I would get in trouble.
Personally I would like to see them both get indicted leading to a Bernie / libertarian / republican to be named later contest.
The possibility is there, but it's not enough to indict Clinton. Unlike how people are automatically indicting Trump for a few promises he didn't keep....
To be fair, a lot of people here wants to indict Hillary because she breathes air, but I agree with you, Trump is not guilty of anything yet, just like Hillary.
Wait, are you saying that nobody here wants to indict Trump?
I could name a few posters, but their feelings may get hurt and I would get in trouble.
Personally I would like to see them both get indicted leading to a Bernie / libertarian / republican to be named later contest.
Trust me, I would have loved to see a Walker/Sanders ticket now.
Unfortunately, what we got is a Trump/Clinton ticket instead.
I never said anything about an opinion piece being news, that was your pathetic attempt to insult my intelligence by drawing your own conclusion to suit your bias. No wonder you see strawmen everywhere.
You might want to try remembering the posts from yesterday a bit harder and focus less on pretending to be a moderate who white knights our extreme right wing posters.
LOL.
If you think KN is "extreme right wing", you really have proven that you don't pay attention.
You know, you still haven't defined the fraud yet.
Not keeping promises is not considered fraud. The people who paid money to receive services got what they paid for.
Like I said before, people did not attend those seminars because Trump promised to hand-pick the instructors, they went to those seminars for real estate advice, which is what they got.
You are also ignoring a lot of testimonies that are actually positive towards the services. But that goes against your narrative, so I don't expect you to be unbiased in this situation.
Define the fraud. The court cases couldn't, so why don't you get a crack at it?
Intentionally misleading people about your service is fraud. Advertising faculty as "hand-picked" when they are admittedly not is intentionally misleading. Even calling it a university is fraudulent. And these are examples from only the handful of court documents released so far.
US TV network NBC is cutting ties with Donald Trump over "recent derogatory statements" that the veteran businessman made about immigrants.
NBC said the company would now not be airing the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants that are co-owned by Mr Trump.
Responding to the announcement, Mr Trump said he would consider suing NBC.
Earlier this month, he accused Mexicans of adding drugs and crime to the US as he announced he was seeking the Republican presidential nomination.
"They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some I assume are good people, but I speak to border guards, and they tell us what we are getting," he said in his speech on 16 June.
He also pledged to build a "great wall" on the US border with Mexico and insisted it would be paid for by Mexicans.
He later insisted he was criticising US lawmakers, not Mexican people.