|
|
Trump Talk™
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-06-22 13:41:14
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »I still want to know why I should vote Trump then. He's got no experience working in government at all, a government is not a business and he won't even come clean on how much he's actually worth.
Great, so we should vote for the person who is actively selling out to the highest bidders? The woman who is taking money that gives her conflicts of interest that make her unable to act against businesses and countries that threaten the interests of the American public?
So better of two demons is Trump? Because what little platform he's given involves things so unpalatable even Paul Ryan's here like naw buddy, that's a bridge too far.
[+]
 Odin.Slore
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2016-06-22 13:41:31
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
[+]
By Blazed1979 2016-06-22 13:42:15
Can you define and predict Trump's presidency? Yeah I think we all have good enough imaginations to know what it will be like. Somewhere between Beavis and Butthead and I still dream of Genie.
He will be an idiot, but predictable. He is the Devil we all know.
Hilary is the establishment's wet dream. She's a glorified st. hooker with some nasty baggage. She will do ANYTHING to win. Trump has principles. Somethings he won't do. I can't honestly imagine him suck someone off for money. I can see Hilary pimping out Chelsea to Goldman Sachs at the annual "f_ck a politician slave" party.
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-06-22 13:43:30
There's plenty of reason not to trust Hillary but give me a break if you think Trump is going to day 1 tell allies like Saudi Arabia to *** off or something. That's beyond his power, beyond the power of any one president. The Congress most definitely won't be having that either.
At best, he'll go down to Mexico and be as big an embarassment was Bush was when he played dodgeball with the shoe thrower.
Forum Moderator
サーバ: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2016-06-22 13:44:45
She's a glorified st. hooker with some nasty baggage. I get this misogynistic feel from your arguments.
By Jassik 2016-06-22 13:44:57
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
Hillary should be held to a higher standard because she's been in government longer? Why not hold them both to a single standard and admit they are both crooks and would make terrible presidents?
[+]
Forum Moderator
サーバ: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2016-06-22 13:46:09
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »There's plenty of reason not to trust Hillary but give me a break if you think Trump is going to day 1 tell allies like Saudi Arabia to *** off or something. That's beyond his power, beyond the power of any one president. The Congress most definitely won't be having that either.
At best, he'll go down to Mexico and be as big an embarassment was Bush was when he played dodgeball with the shoe thrower. Only thing I'd like to see Trump win for is to see him basically tell Kim Jong Un to suck him sideways.
By Jassik 2016-06-22 13:46:55
Can you define and predict Trump's presidency? Yeah I think we all have good enough imaginations to know what it will be like. Somewhere between Beavis and Butthead and I still dream of Genie.
He will be an idiot, but predictable. He is the Devil we all know.
Hilary is the establishment's wet dream. She's a glorified st. hooker with some nasty baggage. She will do ANYTHING to win. Trump has principles. Somethings he won't do. I can't honestly imagine him suck someone off for money. I can see Hilary pimping out Chelsea to Goldman Sachs at the annual "f_ck a politician slave" party.
If you think there's anything trump wouldn't do for a dollar, you don't know trump.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2016-06-22 13:46:56
She has no accomplishments except selling our secrets and political access in 20 minute speaking blocks.
[+]
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-06-22 13:46:59
Hillary will do *anything* to win but Trump won't? The same guy that relished at the idea of people making money off the markets crashing? lol.
[+]
Odin.Slore
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2016-06-22 13:47:14
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
Hillary should be held to a higher standard because she's been in government longer? Why not hold them both to a single standard and admit they are both crooks and would make terrible presidents?
We were talking about hillary and Gen. Petraeus. He got demoted and forced to retire with threats of jail time for doing far less than her.
[+]
By Blazed1979 2016-06-22 13:48:46
She's a glorified st. hooker with some nasty baggage. I get this misogynistic feel from your arguments. No way - she just happens to be a woman, just barely though.
If she was a man I'd have used "male stripper" instead.
Do you think Trump can be described as a male stripper? When has he bent over or gone out of his way to retract something. He sticks with his guns.
Also, Im a male a hetro sexual male. So I haven't had any experience with male strippers, but female st. hookers I have. We once paid one 20 euros to carry a "Repent before its too late" sign for 20 minutes in Brussels. They will do anything for $$$.
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-06-22 13:49:44
She has no accomplishments except selling our secrets and political access in 20 minute speaking blocks.
Why are you mad she's taking money for speeches? Isn't that the hardwork, bootstrap, ruthless capitalism that Republicans claim limp wristed liberals don't understand because they don't understand nature is dog-eat-dog?
She made money off government time. That's her right. You should be applauding her ability to capitalize on her talents for profit.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2016-06-22 13:49:54
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Hillary will do *anything* to win but Trump won't? The same guy that relished at the idea of people making money off the markets crashing? lol.
If you've ever waited to buy stuff on sale you're guilty of the same thing.
[+]
Forum Moderator
サーバ: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2016-06-22 13:50:06
She's a glorified st. hooker with some nasty baggage. I get this misogynistic feel from your arguments. No way - she just happens to be a woman, just barely though.
If she was a man I'd have used "male stripper" instead.
Do you think Trump can be described as a male stripper? When has he bent over or gone out of his way to retract something. He sticks with his guns.
Also, Im a male a hetro sexual male. So I haven't had any experience with male strippers, but female st. hookers I have. We once paid one 20 euros to carry a "Repent before its too late" sign for 20 minutes in Brussels. They will do anything for $$$. This post is the greatest *** thing I've ever read in P&R.
[+]
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-06-22 13:50:35
I mean jesus, I get when liberals snipe at Clinton for taking money from corporate America but that's motherfucking capitalism. Free market. She engaged in a transaction with these companies and they agreed.
[+]
By Jassik 2016-06-22 13:50:57
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
Hillary should be held to a higher standard because she's been in government longer? Why not hold them both to a single standard and admit they are both crooks and would make terrible presidents?
We were talking about hillary and Gen. Petraeus. He got demoted and forced to retire with threats of jail time for doing far less than her.
Less, more... The thing is, those words are meaningless. He committed a crime. Several congressional inquiries and an FBI investigation haven't provided any indication Hillary did. Are you saying that we should ignore whether someone actually broke the law when determining their fate?
Odin.Slore
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2016-06-22 13:50:59
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Hillary will do *anything* to win but Trump won't? The same guy that relished at the idea of people making money off the markets crashing? lol.
You think a good businessman only knows how to make money when the market is good? Hell even I know how to do that and I am no businessman. During crash of 2007 I made a load off a stock called LVS(Las Vegas Sands casino) Bought it for 7.50 a share sold it in 2010 for 58.00 a share and I do not know jack about the stock market but a friend told me it would make money. Most people make money AFTER a market crash.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2016-06-22 13:51:19
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »She has no accomplishments except selling our secrets and political access in 20 minute speaking blocks.
Why are you mad she's taking money for speeches? Isn't that the hardwork, bootstrap, ruthless capitalism that Republicans claim limp wristed liberals don't understand because they don't understand nature is dog-eat-dog?
She made money off government time. That's her right. You should be applauding her ability to capitalize on her talents for profit.
Does the question "what could she possibly say for 20 minutes that is worth 500k?" Ever pop into your head?
Asura.Vyre
Forum Moderator
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15710
By Asura.Vyre 2016-06-22 13:52:12
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »I still want to know why I should vote Trump then. He's got no experience working in government at all, a government is not a business and he won't even come clean on how much he's actually worth.
It's the equivalent of that guy who talks about how yuuuuuuge his *** is but never actually lets anyone see it. Because it's his business how large his penis is yet he never stops talking about it.
Show us the girth certificate already, Trump. ***' Ginger ale out my nose lol.
Odin.Slore
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2016-06-22 13:52:32
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
Hillary should be held to a higher standard because she's been in government longer? Why not hold them both to a single standard and admit they are both crooks and would make terrible presidents?
We were talking about hillary and Gen. Petraeus. He got demoted and forced to retire with threats of jail time for doing far less than her.
Less, more... The thing is, those words are meaningless. He committed a crime. Several congressional inquiries and an FBI investigation haven't provided any indication Hillary did. Are you saying that we should ignore whether someone actually broke the law when determining their fate?
She did break the law plain and clear. Only difference is Gen P didnt have obama and ag lynch watching his back.
Odin.Slore
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2016-06-22 13:53:27
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »She has no accomplishments except selling our secrets and political access in 20 minute speaking blocks.
Why are you mad she's taking money for speeches? Isn't that the hardwork, bootstrap, ruthless capitalism that Republicans claim limp wristed liberals don't understand because they don't understand nature is dog-eat-dog?
She made money off government time. That's her right. You should be applauding her ability to capitalize on her talents for profit.
Does the question "what could she possibly say for 20 minutes that is worth 500k?" Ever pop into your head?
I would say moreso what can she PROMISE
Odin.Slore
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2016-06-22 13:54:00
in 20 mins, sorry post cut off
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-06-22 13:54:14
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »She has no accomplishments except selling our secrets and political access in 20 minute speaking blocks.
Why are you mad she's taking money for speeches? Isn't that the hardwork, bootstrap, ruthless capitalism that Republicans claim limp wristed liberals don't understand because they don't understand nature is dog-eat-dog?
She made money off government time. That's her right. You should be applauding her ability to capitalize on her talents for profit.
Does the question "what could she possibly say for 20 minutes that is worth 500k?" Ever pop into your head?
That's none of your business. Private industry paid her for services rendered. That's capitalism. The thing you lecture us all about. Seems your jealous about the large amount of money she made in 20 minutes. Perhaps you should work hard and one day you could make 500k in 20minutes.
Get a job, hippie.
[+]
By Jassik 2016-06-22 13:54:29
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Hillary will do *anything* to win but Trump won't? The same guy that relished at the idea of people making money off the markets crashing? lol.
If you've ever waited to buy stuff on sale you're guilty of the same thing.
The stock market crashing compared to companies marketing tactics... Acknowledging a good time to buy is not the depth of trumps statements.
By Blazed1979 2016-06-22 13:55:18
I didn't say money doesn't motivate Donald Trump. I'm sure he's got images of himself lying nakes in $$$ bills painted on the ceiling of his bedroom so he can get himself off to every morning when wakes up (it might also be a painting of his daughter - drum roll i went there)
But what he isn't is a "little man" that can be bossed around and told what to do. Hasn't his war on everything and everyone proven that? Fired from MBC, what does he do? he goes "yeah f u 2".
Imagine if Hilary was even threatened with losing support from one of her many corporate supporters - she would be barking like a poodle and purring like a kitty cat for their forgivness (God damn it if that sounds sexist I'm sorry - have good women run for office so that I don't tear them down).
By Jassik 2016-06-22 13:55:22
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
Hillary should be held to a higher standard because she's been in government longer? Why not hold them both to a single standard and admit they are both crooks and would make terrible presidents?
We were talking about hillary and Gen. Petraeus. He got demoted and forced to retire with threats of jail time for doing far less than her.
Less, more... The thing is, those words are meaningless. He committed a crime. Several congressional inquiries and an FBI investigation haven't provided any indication Hillary did. Are you saying that we should ignore whether someone actually broke the law when determining their fate?
She did break the law plain and clear. Only difference is Gen P didnt have obama and ag lynch watching his back.
Which law?
Forum Moderator
サーバ: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2016-06-22 13:56:51
hillary is a slug and the fact that she breaks all the rules, lies, cheats, manipulates everything and liberals have no problem with that is disgusting.
Trump back steps something that he has a change on and liberals implode, but hillary does it and its ok. The logic is amazing. It's because in the grand scheme of things, her rule breakage amounts to jaywalking, it's not really worth taking the time to write out a ticket but there's no harm in looking at her and saying "don't do that."
Why then did they slam General Petraeus so hard? He did less and liberals called for more punishment. Gen. Petraeus wasn't running for president. Hillary is and despite what she has been saying, she's been running since 2007. That's why she gets an out. That and wealth, as Vyre said.
The government has wasted a bunch of money, trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary, now they are investigating her on the email thing and in my honest opinion, that investigation isn't a waste but unless they truly find something bad, persuing legal action on her would cost more than it's worth.
He wasn't running for president I agree with you there and she is. Which means to me she should be held to a higher standard
Hillary should be held to a higher standard because she's been in government longer? Why not hold them both to a single standard and admit they are both crooks and would make terrible presidents?
We were talking about hillary and Gen. Petraeus. He got demoted and forced to retire with threats of jail time for doing far less than her.
Less, more... The thing is, those words are meaningless. He committed a crime. Several congressional inquiries and an FBI investigation haven't provided any indication Hillary did. Are you saying that we should ignore whether someone actually broke the law when determining their fate?
She did break the law plain and clear. Only difference is Gen P didnt have obama and ag lynch watching his back.
Which law? I think it was more of an email protocol that wasn't followed, but not 100% on that.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2016-06-22 13:57:43
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »She has no accomplishments except selling our secrets and political access in 20 minute speaking blocks.
Why are you mad she's taking money for speeches? Isn't that the hardwork, bootstrap, ruthless capitalism that Republicans claim limp wristed liberals don't understand because they don't understand nature is dog-eat-dog?
She made money off government time. That's her right. You should be applauding her ability to capitalize on her talents for profit.
Does the question "what could she possibly say for 20 minutes that is worth 500k?" Ever pop into your head?
That's none of your business. Private industry paid her for services rendered. That's capitalism. The thing you lecture us all about. Seems your jealous about the large amount of money she made in 20 minutes. Perhaps you should work hard and one day you could make 500k in 20minutes.
Get a job, hippie.
Trump makes billions: he's gotta be scamming people.
Hilary makes hundreds of millions: none of our business.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
By Blazed1979 2016-06-22 13:59:24
Trump a businessman that is entering politics.
Hilary a businesswoman that deals in politics.
Why can't people see the difference. This bipartisan crap needs to end. Its ok to go to the other side when there's nothing but dog ***on your side of the lawn.
Quote: US TV network NBC is cutting ties with Donald Trump over "recent derogatory statements" that the veteran businessman made about immigrants.
NBC said the company would now not be airing the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants that are co-owned by Mr Trump.
Responding to the announcement, Mr Trump said he would consider suing NBC.
Earlier this month, he accused Mexicans of adding drugs and crime to the US as he announced he was seeking the Republican presidential nomination.
"They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some I assume are good people, but I speak to border guards, and they tell us what we are getting," he said in his speech on 16 June.
He also pledged to build a "great wall" on the US border with Mexico and insisted it would be paid for by Mexicans.
He later insisted he was criticising US lawmakers, not Mexican people.
I'm honestly surprised with some of the shit he says. Even though I probably shouldn't be.
|
|
