In gold/silver, sudowoodo could be permanently missed by not catching him, as he was an obstacle in the game path. And now, one of my most former prized Pokemon accomplishments in catching sudo is locked behind this Asia specific nonsense!?
I'm almost positive trading is not going to be global. That would essentially defeat the purpose of having region-exclusive pokemon, as anyone could obtain any pokemon.
What sounds like the most logical idea which has been hypothesized by users is a range-based trading queue system, where you can view within a short radius of your surroundings anybody particularly looking to trade a certain type, and what they'd want in return.
Walk into a mall, put your 95% IV Blastoise up for trade, and then request a Charizard in return. All others within a 500 meter radius sees your trade request and can respond, accept, or counter.
This is just the idea behind how we think they will implement it, but I can almost guarantee global trading will not exist. Otherwise, what would have been the point of making region exlusives in the first place?
I also caught a Sudowoodo so it isn't Asia exclusive like I had predicted it would be. A friend of mine also caught a Heracross so we're good there too.
Looks like the Region Exclusive pokemon is Heracross for Central and South America.
However, Niantic got lazy, and drew the line at the 29th parallel. Which means there's two sections of the US (and I've confirmed with friends) that can catch Heracross.
Anyone get any of the upgrade items (aka Sun Stone) from Pokestops yet? Curious on how rare they are. Have a 100% IV Seadra waiting on that Dragon Scale....
Anyone get any of the upgrade items (aka Sun Stone) from Pokestops yet? Curious on how rare they are. Have a 100% IV Seadra waiting on that Dragon Scale....
I got a Metal Coat the very first PokeStop I spun last night, used it on my Onix immediately. I haven't seen anything of the sort since then.
When you own land, you often own the rights to minerals, oil, or metals beneath it. Do you also own the right to virtual or mixed reality creations on it? And do you have the legal ability to legislate their use or positioning over virtual representations of your property?
That’s what Milwaukee County appears to be saying.
The county beside Lake Michigan has passed an ordinance requiring companies creating virtual or mixed reality creations in apps to get a permit to locate them in the real world. Niantic, the company behind Pokémon Go, would have to pay between $100 and $1,000 in order to assign Pokéstops inside public parks, for instance, and to allow the game’s creatures to roam there.
This is an interesting precedent.
Actual property can be owned, of course, and virtual property can be as well. Second Life, for instance, is in its second decade of selling virtual property, and it’s moving into VR. But mixed or augmented reality is a new kettle of fish.
Augmented reality is a virtual overlay on actual reality, painting digital objects over analog backgrounds. The digital objects — whether monsters in a game, tools in a Microsoft Hololens, or directions on a real-time mapping systems — don’t impinge on “reality” in any way.
However, they do have impacts.
The county has had an influx of mobile game players who, it says, added traffic, left trash, potentially affected ecologically sensitive dunes, and cost the sheriff’s department extra due to required security.
On the one hand, public spaces are public, and people have a right to go there. On the other hand, the digital world is having an increasing impact on the physical world. Ask the neighborhood restaurant that was flooded with foodies after the Michelin Guide — the gourmet’s bible — mistakenly awarded it a Michelin star.
The state of Illinois is apparently considering a similar statute, so this appears to be something the mobile games industry — and perhaps the entire mobile and mixed-reality community — will have to deal with.
The result could be chaos and gridlock, as mixed reality and augmented reality seek ways to get permits for thousands of global locales and legislative areas.
And the costs could cripple a still-young industry.
When you own land, you often own the rights to minerals, oil, or metals beneath it. Do you also own the right to virtual or mixed reality creations on it? And do you have the legal ability to legislate their use or positioning over virtual representations of your property?
That’s what Milwaukee County appears to be saying.
The county beside Lake Michigan has passed an ordinance requiring companies creating virtual or mixed reality creations in apps to get a permit to locate them in the real world. Niantic, the company behind Pokémon Go, would have to pay between $100 and $1,000 in order to assign Pokéstops inside public parks, for instance, and to allow the game’s creatures to roam there.
This is an interesting precedent.
Actual property can be owned, of course, and virtual property can be as well. Second Life, for instance, is in its second decade of selling virtual property, and it’s moving into VR. But mixed or augmented reality is a new kettle of fish.
Augmented reality is a virtual overlay on actual reality, painting digital objects over analog backgrounds. The digital objects — whether monsters in a game, tools in a Microsoft Hololens, or directions on a real-time mapping systems — don’t impinge on “reality” in any way.
However, they do have impacts.
The county has had an influx of mobile game players who, it says, added traffic, left trash, potentially affected ecologically sensitive dunes, and cost the sheriff’s department extra due to required security.
On the one hand, public spaces are public, and people have a right to go there. On the other hand, the digital world is having an increasing impact on the physical world. Ask the neighborhood restaurant that was flooded with foodies after the Michelin Guide — the gourmet’s bible — mistakenly awarded it a Michelin star.
The state of Illinois is apparently considering a similar statute, so this appears to be something the mobile games industry — and perhaps the entire mobile and mixed-reality community — will have to deal with.
The result could be chaos and gridlock, as mixed reality and augmented reality seek ways to get permits for thousands of global locales and legislative areas.
And the costs could cripple a still-young industry.
I should probably repost this under Pokemon Go in Arcade.
Legally speaking, the county does have the right to request permits for public spaces.
This is new territory, as augmented reality has no legal definitions, and probably can be considered nonproperty, or intangible property (meaning, the state cannot issue permits or deeds of such property. They can issue proprietary deeds, such as patents, on properties though, but this would go beyond the scope of a legally defined proprietary deed.).
I guess it's up for the courts to decide, because I'm sure that somebody is going to sue over this.
This could bring up the whole concept of who truly owns digital subscription content. Is it the company, or is it the person who subscribes to it.
Even though we have player agreements to FFXI, stating we, as players, have no legal right of ownership over our characters, if this were to go to trial, it could open the door up to that being changed.
Thats just HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE, niantic made bucks and the state want a cut. No court will pass this, just look definition of virtual, case close. It saddens me to see this kind of greed, is toxic and cripple future investments.
Caught a Togetic for the first time today with a Pinap berry. I somehow ended up getting 10 total candies from it? The norm would be 6 total, not sure if there's a rare chance for Pinap berry to double up candies twice, or if its something related to Togetic. Anyone know?
Caught a Togetic for the first time today with a Pinap berry. I somehow ended up getting 10 total candies from it? The norm would be 6 total, not sure if there's a rare chance for Pinap berry to double up candies twice, or if its something related to Togetic. Anyone know?
Second Stage evolutions now give 300 Stardust and 5 Candy.
Third Stage evolutions will give 500 Stardust and 10 Candy.
That is also a very nice catch.
Caught a Togetic for the first time today with a Pinap berry. I somehow ended up getting 10 total candies from it? The norm would be 6 total, not sure if there's a rare chance for Pinap berry to double up candies twice, or if its something related to Togetic. Anyone know?
Second Stage evolutions now give 300 Stardust and 5 Candy.
Third Stage evolutions will give 500 Stardust and 10 Candy.
That is also a very nice catch.
That's awesome. Before, there wasn't much incentive to catch, lets say, a 400 CP Gengar since it would require so much candy to power it up to a useful level. Now, it's worth it to catch very low CP 2nd or 3rd stage evolutions. This 2nd Gen update has been pretty amazing overall.
Caught a Togetic for the first time today with a Pinap berry. I somehow ended up getting 10 total candies from it? The norm would be 6 total, not sure if there's a rare chance for Pinap berry to double up candies twice, or if its something related to Togetic. Anyone know?
Second Stage evolutions now give 300 Stardust and 5 Candy.
Third Stage evolutions will give 500 Stardust and 10 Candy.
That is also a very nice catch.
That's awesome. Before, there wasn't much incentive to catch, lets say, a 400 CP Gengar since it would require so much candy to power it up to a useful level. Now, it's worth it to catch very low CP 2nd or 3rd stage evolutions. This 2nd Gen update has been pretty amazing overall.
Depending on their IV as well I take.
No point getting a high CP with Awful IV and pumping it up, much rather get an medium CP with 82~100% IV Range and working on that instead.
I realize the game itself won't look anything like this until maybe a decade or two of updates, if ever. Even so, I am happy to be alive in this day and age.
For perspective, it is very reminscent but NOT TO BE CONFUSED with Google's April Fool's joke: