Ragnarok.Raenil said: »
Ah, so that's what a Lordgrim post is.
Whatever you do, don't backread. That might be the pico on top of this sloppy seven-layer dip of a read.
Random Politics & Religion #06
|
Random Politics & Religion #06
Whatever you do, don't backread. That might be the pico on top of this sloppy seven-layer dip of a read.
[+]
Shiva.Carrelo said: » Siren.Akson said: » Who are you to judge. They were born that way. It's not thier choice whom they're looking at sexually. Others are just Natural Born Killers. Stop hating Brutalizing children and killing people vs. consensual sex with another adult human. Where the actual *** do you see an equivalence here? Josiahkf said: » Siren.Lordgrim said: » Sodomy is not positive. If they are not positive in your personal experience, I'm sorry to hear that my friend. That could be very disheartening. That's your opinion, from a biblical view homosexual behavior is classified as Sodomy man on man woman on woman. And nations were destroyed by accepting it's practice. Nah, you took took the topic and took it offroading.
@Zah: I've been involved in this ***show for the last few days, unfortunately. I just wasn't particularly active when Lordgrim was previously active and missed out on all of the, uh, 'fun' associated.
[+]
Siren.Akson said: » Shiva.Carrelo said: » Siren.Akson said: » Who are you to judge. They were born that way. It's not thier choice whom they're looking at sexually. Others are just Natural Born Killers. Stop hating Brutalizing children and killing people vs. consensual sex with another adult human. Where the actual *** do you see an equivalence here? Jassik said: » Pedophilia is definitely not a choice. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Josiahfk said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Josiahkf said: » Do you believe people choose to be straight or gay nausi? Or do you believe it's not of their choice. I'm sure that has quite a few negative effects on society, probably a ton of insignificant effects, and probably a couple positives as well. The more common it becomes in our society, the easier it is for individuals to start being sexually turned on by their same gender? No, I wouldn't put it quite like that, more like the less stigma there is around it, the more open and curious people will be toward it and try it. Christ it seems like every girl in college I know Had her very own lesbian experience. Yet most of them weren't lesbians. I've dated a few former lesbians, oddly enough more than I care to admit. It's usually the same story of I thought I was gay but it was just a phase. And? There have been studies pointing to bi-sexuality and lesbianism being an evolutionary throw-back to the communal reliance in raising and securing offspring. I mean are you just trying to be dramatic here? I clearly said it has pros/cons and a whole bunch of "who gives a ***". The point is that the prevalence of gay culture and its acceptance probably influences otherwise strait people into CHOOSING to experimenting with the orientation when they otherwise would have no interest. Siren.Lordgrim said: » Josiahkf said: » Siren.Lordgrim said: » Sodomy is not positive. If they are not positive in your personal experience, I'm sorry to hear that my friend. That could be very disheartening. That's your opinion, from a biblical view homosexual behavior is classified as Sodomy man on man woman on woman. And nations were destroyed by accepting it's practice. Name one Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction
[+]
Siren.Akson said: » Everything in life is gd choice ffs.... nobody forces anyone to look at children in a sexual manner just as they're not forced to look at the same sex in the same manner. Since some are so *** dumb, YES obviously pedophelia is worst & criminal... yet the reality remains the same. Both pedophiles & homosexuals chose thier path. To think otherwise you might as well just blame god instead of such ppl cuz they just cant resist being what they should not be... "they were created to be that way" total *** nonsense Let's go back to the part where being straight is a choice. Acting on an impulse is a choice, but attraction to children, is the same mechanism as attraction to adults of the same or opposite sex. That's why pedophilia isn't illegal but child molestation is. Just like how it's not illegal for me to want to grab the phone out of another driver's hand and insert it violently into one of the openings on their body, but actually doing that would be. Seriously, though, if everything is a choice, choose to be gay. Go to the local glory hole and just let the evening go where it wants.
[+]
Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction Siren.Akson said: » Shiva.Carrelo said: » Siren.Akson said: » Who are you to judge. They were born that way. It's not thier choice whom they're looking at sexually. Others are just Natural Born Killers. Stop hating Brutalizing children and killing people vs. consensual sex with another adult human. Where the actual *** do you see an equivalence here? There are already enough violent shitstains actively looking for reasons to attack and murder gay people. We'd honestly really appreciate it if you'd stop feeding their lunacy by spewing your vacuous *** at every opportunity.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Caitsith.Zahrah said: » And? There have been studies pointing to bi-sexuality and lesbianism being an evolutionary throw-back to the communal reliance in raising and securing offspring. I mean are you just trying to be dramatic here? I clearly said it has pros/cons and a whole bunch of "who gives a ***". The point is that the prevalence of gay culture and its acceptance probably influences otherwise strait people into CHOOSING to experimenting with the orientation when they otherwise would have no interest. Unfortunately, I can imagine a lot of people were more keen on preserving their health and safety as opposed to being true to themselves and their desires. The risk isn't as high anymore, despite the recent shooting in Orlando, and people are more free to actually explore their sexuality than they have been in an exceptionally long time.
[+]
Shiva.Carrelo said: » There are already enough violent shitstains actively looking for reasons to attack and murder gay people. We'd honestly really appreciate it if you'd stop feeding their lunacy by spewing your vacuous *** at every opportunity.
[+]
Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Siren.Akson said: » Shiva.Carrelo said: » There are already enough violent shitstains actively looking for reasons to attack and murder gay people. We'd honestly really appreciate it if you'd stop feeding their lunacy by spewing your vacuous *** at every opportunity. Welp, I guess that's about as much of a response as you had left to make. My assumption was more that you carry those lovely ideas of yours with you into the real world after you've logged off, but maybe we're the only ones fortunate enough to hear what you so eloquently have to say. Come to think of it though, we have actually had our share of unstable posters on this site. You really never know. :)
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Kiddie porn exists because pedophiles do. Do you think there would be more or less straight people if there was no such thing as regular porn?
[+]
Siren.Akson said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction This is not true, at all, in regards to women of equal (or lesser) attractiveness. There has never been a moment in my life where I made a conscious decision regarding who I've found sexually attractive. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Josiahfk said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Josiahkf said: » Do you believe people choose to be straight or gay nausi? Or do you believe it's not of their choice. I'm sure that has quite a few negative effects on society, probably a ton of insignificant effects, and probably a couple positives as well. The more common it becomes in our society, the easier it is for individuals to start being sexually turned on by their same gender? No, I wouldn't put it quite like that, more like the less stigma there is around it, the more open and curious people will be toward it and try it. Christ it seems like every girl in college I know Had her very own lesbian experience. Yet most of them weren't lesbians. I've dated a few former lesbians, oddly enough more than I care to admit. It's usually the same story of I thought I was gay but it was just a phase. And? There have been studies pointing to bi-sexuality and lesbianism being an evolutionary throw-back to the communal reliance in raising and securing offspring. I mean are you just trying to be dramatic here? I clearly said it has pros/cons and a whole bunch of "who gives a ***". The point is that the prevalence of gay culture and its acceptance probably influences otherwise strait people into CHOOSING to experimenting with the orientation when they otherwise would have no interest. How do you get dramatic from tossing out a little blurb about the possibility of our perpetuation as a species could be due in part to female fluidity in sexuality? Ragnarok.Raenil said: » @Zah: I've been involved in this ***show for the last few days, unfortunately. I just wasn't particularly active when Lordgrim was previously active and missed out on all of the, uh, 'fun' associated. Sorry. I only backread about three pages prior to this one. Tired, and the route this thread would take since Sunday morning was too predictable I'm just putting this one on autopilot and divvying out the spirit [+]'s from here on out. Keep on keepin' on, brotha.
[+]
Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Kiddie porn exists because pedophiles do. Do you think there would be more or less straight people if there was no such thing as regular porn? I don't disagree with your underlying principle, I just think it's short sighted. I think the more society accepts and tolerates X then the more of it we will see where it never really was before. Case in point, regular porn? What's that? Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Kiddie porn exists because pedophiles do. Do you think there would be more or less straight people if there was no such thing as regular porn? I don't disagree with your underlying principle, I just think it's short sighted. I think the more society accepts and tolerates X then the more of it we will see where it never really was before. Case in point, regular porn? What's that? You are operating under the assumption that if we just let gay people live their lives that everyone will want to be gay. That's just not how it works, bud. You might see more gay people out these days, but it's not that there's more of them, it's that they can actually go to the store without the threat of being lynched.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Kiddie porn exists because pedophiles do. Do you think there would be more or less straight people if there was no such thing as regular porn? I don't disagree with your underlying principle, I just think it's short sighted. I think the more society accepts and tolerates X then the more of it we will see where it never really was before.
[+]
Shiva.Carrelo said: » Siren.Akson said: » Shiva.Carrelo said: » There are already enough violent shitstains actively looking for reasons to attack and murder gay people. We'd honestly really appreciate it if you'd stop feeding their lunacy by spewing your vacuous *** at every opportunity. Welp, I guess that's about as much of a response as you had left to make. My assumption was more that you carry those lovely ideas of yours with you into the real world after you've logged off, but maybe we're the only ones fortunate enough to hear what you so eloquently have to say. Come to think of it though, we have actually had our share of unstable posters on this site. You really never know. :)
[+]
Being born a certain way doesn't excuse you from the repercussions of your actions.
[+]
Siren.Akson said: » I respect and treat LGBT ppl the same as anyone else in RL. So, you liken everyone's existence to following a fad? Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Kiddie porn exists because pedophiles do. Do you think there would be more or less straight people if there was no such thing as regular porn? I don't disagree with your underlying principle, I just think it's short sighted. I think the more society accepts and tolerates X then the more of it we will see where it never really was before. Case in point, regular porn? What's that? You are operating under the assumption that if we just let gay people live their lives that everyone will want to be gay. That's just not how it works, bud. You might see more gay people out these days, but it's not that there's more of them, it's that they can actually go to the store without the threat of being lynched. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Being attracted =/= acting on that attraction He's separating the attraction from the act. A pedophile doesn't necessarily hurt children, they just have the attraction. The point is that you don't choose who you are attracted to, you choose who you screw. As I've said, I'm not so sure about that. Do you think that there would be more or less pedophiles out there if there was no such thing as kiddie porn? Kiddie porn exists because pedophiles do. Do you think there would be more or less straight people if there was no such thing as regular porn? I don't disagree with your underlying principle, I just think it's short sighted. I think the more society accepts and tolerates X then the more of it we will see where it never really was before. Case in point, regular porn? What's that? You are operating under the assumption that if we just let gay people live their lives that everyone will want to be gay. That's just not how it works, bud. You might see more gay people out these days, but it's not that there's more of them, it's that they can actually go to the store without the threat of being lynched. Possibly, but nobody is glorifying being gay. And, even if they were, and your theory is correct, who cares? |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.