Science Vs Science Fiction

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
言語: JP EN FR DE
日本語版のFFXIVPRO利用したい場合は、上記の"JP"を設定して、又はjp.ffxivpro.comを直接に利用してもいいです
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Chatterbox » Science vs Science Fiction
Science vs Science Fiction
First Page 2 3 ... 10 11 12 ... 21 22 23
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 19:57:46
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 20:03:43  
eslim said: »
i'm gonna take 5 mins out of my life and use alittle magic..

earth's gravitational orbit = here

nvm, google is always lying- *** googley googlie googliness supper.
That's the Geo Magnetic field >< which has the Moon locked to one side always facing us..
...not Gravity telling me Magnetics > Gravity

This whole Thread from Page1 to Now has drained and exhausted the living ***out of me...
...I cant Stop now. I will find out.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 20:18:25
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 20:25:40  
Reddit not answering me ><

Eslim I couldnt understand you even if I tried

I need simple answers. Which will allow me to form bigger questions.

Magnetic Moon
Quote:
The magnetic field of the Moon is very weak in comparison to that of the Earth. Other major differences are that the Moon does not currently have a dipolar magnetic field (as would be generated by a geodynamo in its core) and the varying magnetization that is present is almost entirely crustal in origin.
That is SO *** interesting.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 20:33:38
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 20:37:32
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 20:42:37
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 20:45:03  
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
And then use your bookshelf to tell your daughter quantum data using the second hand of a watch.
That's what I dont understand. Mass cancels Mass, I think?, so the Earth only has 1/3 of the pull that it possess outside space even capable of effecting the Moon? 1/3 w/ Magnetics not allowing the Moon to spin. Nvm I thinking Size. Why doesnt Quatum data exist to begin w/, or anything at all, showing the exact % of Earth's gravitational pull that hits the Moon?
Josiahkf said: »
Akson you really need to watch the movie interstellar, twice.
You will likely learn a lot and be greatly entertained.
I'll look it up. No answer from Reddit and I wont take it any further.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 20:59:29
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 21:02:45
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 21:04:01
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 21:08:38  
Josiahkf said: »
When he said the Sun's highest gravitational range is 82 million miles
Who said that? If I know the Sun's range I could calculate the Earth's, right? Just like I was trying to do the other way around. Unless that whole idea is fail and doesnt work to begin w/
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 21:16:10
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 21:23:14  
Josiahkf said: »
I didn't follow the math and discussion you were having, but I'm referring to whatever the highest calculated range was in which the sun's gravity can have tangeable effects on objects that approach.

Picture it like a huge invisible sphere around the sun in which all the planets orbit and the distance past them
If it's controlling Pluto's orbit and those asteroids beyond. It would have to reach 5 Billion miles? Longest distance Pluto is from the Sun.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 21:26:14
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 21:29:47  
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
Siren.Akson said: »
Josiahkf said: »
I didn't follow the math and discussion you were having, but I'm referring to whatever the highest calculated range was in which the sun's gravity can have tangeable effects on objects that approach.

Picture it like a huge invisible sphere around the sun in which all the planets orbit and the distance past them
If it's controlling Pluto's orbit and those asteroids beyond. It would have to reach 5 Billion miles? Longest distance Pluto is from the Sun.
Yeah the dun'd gravitational force clearly reaches past Pluto, or else Pluto would fly away in a straight line and escape upon getting st the furthest point of its orbit.

So in the distance past Pluto where the sun's gravity is still strong enough to cause orbiting, we might have more tiny planets waiting to be discovered. Or it might just be empy space until the sun's force gets weaker and weaker. That's why we search the night sky for information and send probes.
If the Sun's Gravitational Pull is so strong. How does it not devour tiny Mercury 36m miles away, closest to it, yet whips around Pluto 5b miles away like a Boss? Idk how it's so strong + weak at the same time.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 21:32:08
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 21:51:36  
Mercury - 36m Miles
Quote:
Mercury is the smallest and innermost planet in the Solar System. Its orbital period (about 88 Earth days) is less than any other planet in the Solar System. After one orbit, Mercury has rotated 1.5 times, so after two complete orbits the same hemisphere is again illuminated.
Pluto - 5b Miles
Quote:
Pluto's orbital period is 248 years. Pluto's rotation period, its day, is equal to 6.39 Earth days.

I dont see anything explaining why Mercury has not yet been engulfed by the Sun ><
Quote:
Mercury
- mean radius 2439.7km = 0.3829 Earths
- volume 6.083 x 10^10 km3 = 0.054 Earths
- mass 3.3022 x 10^23 kg = 0.055 Earths

Pluto
- mean radius 1195km = 0.19 Earths
- volume 7.15 x 10^9 km3 = 0.0066 Earths
- mass 1.305 x 10^22 kg = 0.0021 Earths
While keeping Pluto in Orbit as well w/ the Sun...

Mercury should not exist IMO if the Sun's gravitational is that strong. That or Pluto needs to gtfo... it's a dwarf anyways
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 21:56:07
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 22:01:39  
If that is True.
Quote:
Mercury speeds around the sun every 88 Earth days, traveling through space at nearly 112,000 mph (180,000 kph), faster than any other planet.
What keeps Mercury going so fast?

Gravity pulls inward not aroundward.. (which aint even a word)
Shouldnt Mercury slow down? Our Space Shuttles 30k miles/hour just to not fall. They use fuel.

Magnetics? Yet even that should pull inward ><
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:05:10
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:06:19
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:07:42
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 22:10:31  
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
it's not that it needs a fuel source to move, it's just that there is no wind resistance to slow mercury down. It forever keeps moving at it's original speed (until it hits something again) and instead of flying off into space, gravity from the sun keeps it orbiting.

like the feather and the bowling ball being dropped in a vacuum that you watched a video about.
How come our space shuttles do need fuel? Or am I mistaken. If Mercury doesnt need. Then why is this not the same for both. Earth has Mass. Sun has Mass. They might not be exactly the same size/mass ratio differential but shouldnt we be able to Orbit the Earth w/o fuel like Mercury?
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:12:33
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:14:42
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:17:58
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 Siren.Akson
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: AKs0n
Posts: 2172
By Siren.Akson 2016-10-04 22:35:21  
Josiahkf said: »
so we could have had trillions of planets over the lifetime of our star, but only the current 8 we have happened to be going the right speed and passed the sun at the right distance to be pulled into an orbit.
Why do they all go in the same Direction revolving the Sun? They all happened to get caught up in Earth's gravity at the perfect speeds? Understandable. Them all going the same exact way is a rather astronomically low probability for such a coincidence beyond possibility? Idk That's how it sounds to me. What if we find other Solar Systems all moving Revolving thier own Stars in the direction thier Star spins just like our Solar System? How many would we need to find before such probilities are impossible w/o accepting that the Sun's Axis decides everything?

I believe what you're saying is True. I just think there is more to the equation. Gravity is not capable of deciding which Direction planets travel revolving our Sun and every other Star in the Universe. Is it?
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 22:56:12
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2016-10-04 23:08:19
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
First Page 2 3 ... 10 11 12 ... 21 22 23