Post deleted by User.
Random Politics & Religion #23 (Fake News)
|
Random Politics & Religion #23 (Fake News)
[+]
Keep it civil, if you're gonna *** with someone, try using Trump gifs.
Anna Ruthven said: »  My reaction every time big poppa Vladimir Rooks sends me down to interact with you miscreants Anna Ruthven said: » Keep it civil you're the one that's out of line. We're american, we're idiots, and we have the ability to spew nonsense anonymously. I think the thing that's out of line is your expectations. *** you. #boycottFFXIAH #2017 #dumbandloud
[+]
Oklahoma mod is gonna Oklahoma.
[+]
Nausi said: » So when do we investigate that obama illegally spied on trump? Cause i have my suspicions. . /rubsforehead Have we forgotten Devin Nunes already? 1. This is being investigated. That is the whole reason Trump asked for "congress" to start investigating. Which led to the very weird Nunes press conference white house thing and then him recusing himself from the investigation. Which led to the Senate hearing being the lead investigation in Congress. Which led to Congress finally understanding what 'unmasking' is under FISA 702.....because they haven't been reading the ***they re-new every 3-5 years since 9/11 2. If Trump has evidence he was spied he can release it to the public. Seriosuly....why do you think there are congressional intelligence meetings going on or Flynn is being subpoenaed?
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: » Keep it civil, if you're gonna *** with someone, try using Trump gifs. YouTube Video Placeholder See thing is is I don't wanna think that is why I elected Trump
[+]
I think it was under 120 characters....
/kicksdust
[+]
eliroo said: » Nausi said: » Well since we've investigated this current president for the past 10 months and found nothing. Time to move on no? Hard to continue an investigation if he keeps firing the people doing it. Also hard to trust that the investigation is being fully supported if he keeps firing the people doing it.
[+]
Asura.Saevel said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » You have evidence stating that Trump fired Comey because he was investigating Trump and not because Comey is an inept director? No evidence required, he feels that Trump did and that's required to Immediately Impeach President Trump. It's fun watching the liberals digging their hole deeper and alienating the American population. This concept cannot be overstated.
[+]
fonewear said: » I'll allow it.
[+]
Shiva.Nikolce said: » eliroo said: » I can view a situation objectively no you can't. but only because it's impossible.... objectively in a way that is not dependent on the mind for existence. Objectively meaning I view a situation without a bias on the onset. Quote: in a way that is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions. eliroo said: » Objectively meaning I view a situation without a bias on the onset. Everyone has bias. It's the degree of bias that differs.
[+]
Nausi said: » eliroo said: » Nausi said: » Well since we've investigated this current president for the past 10 months and found nothing. Time to move on no? Hard to continue an investigation if he keeps firing the people doing it. Also hard to trust that the investigation is being fully supported if he keeps firing the people doing it. This comment is ignorant. At the very least the last line seems to be right: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-probe-continue-no-white-house-updates-fbi-director-hearing-a7730856.html All we can do is take McCabe at his word and let this play out. Asura.Kingnobody said: » I call ***. Everyone has bias. It's the degree of bias that differs. I agree to an extent. You can view a situation without a bias if you wanted just takes some work. I personally take a cold shower, swim around in ice and then drink a piping hot cup of salt water. I then meditate for a few hours and read two differing articles on the subject. I then formulate my opinion on which article writer looked better. eliroo said: » Objectively meaning I view a situation without a bias on the onset. One can claim that they take care to minimize personal bias, but nobody can claim that they view matters of opinion with zero bias. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Sigh, and I was trying so hard to avoid saying this.... FALSE EQUIVALENCE Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Sigh, and I was trying so hard to avoid saying this.... FALSE EQUIVALENCE Haha, the reason I avoid saying "FALSE EQUIVALENCE" is because I got so sick of you saying it all the time. You can't just now cherry pick very specific aspects of the two cases in an attempt to equivocate them on the grander scale. Take your own frickin' medicine.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » eliroo said: » Objectively meaning I view a situation without a bias on the onset. One can claim that they take care to minimize personal bias, but nobody can claim that they view matters of opinion with zero bias. Without a bias on the "onset". It isn't impossible. You just figure out what players you have in the game and remove them from thought when tackling a subject matter. Would "Objectively as possible" be a better statement? I don't want them to investigate. I like not trusting the government.
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Haha, the reason I avoid saying "FALSE EQUIVALENCE" is because I got so sick of you saying it all the time. You can't just now cherry pick very specific aspects of the two cases in an attempt to equivocate them on the grander scale. Take your own frickin' medicine. Good point. One is the president and one isn't. I wonder which one is more impacting on american Society. Hillary's emails or our the fact our president is potentially in bed with Russia. |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.