Shiva.Zerowone said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Asura.Eiryl said: »
No. That's what they're trying to surmise though. It doesn't matter if the question stated that trump himself was the whistleblower, it still would be against the law to read.
And the senators purposely trying to circumvent that law should be imprisoned.
And the senators purposely trying to circumvent that law should be imprisoned.
Um, the word “whistleblower” was not found anywhere in that question. You’re actually doing more to out the whistleblower by NOT addressing the question because you’re basically admitting who it is just by your unwillingness to even say the name out loud.
“Is Eric Ciaramella the whistleblower?”
“I cannot out the whistleblower.”
This response does not out the whistleblower
“Was Eric Ciaramella on the plot to impeach the President?”
“I cannot out the whistleblower.”
This response outs the whistleblower completely.
Or simply as Republican and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court you're aware of what name is being floated around and you arent even playing that dumb ***because you understand federal laws.
Yeah, sure, that’s it. Better make sure to not allow questions that involve someone who isn’t the real whistleblower just because people think he’s the whistleblower even though the actual question doesn’t even use the word “whistleblower”. That makes perfect sense.
Good thing you're not the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Oh hey, that makes two of us.