ALL TRUMP!!! ALL THE TIME!!!

Fun fact: Trump has never polled at 95% approval in the Republican Party.

Have you actually read the “transcript”? Have you read then disclaimer that is in fine print?

If they were witnesses their testimony wouldn’t be just “feelings”.
Matter of fact there was more than just feelings. Clearly you don’t know what they stated.


Squashed by threatening Republican Senators to not break party lines or face grave repercussions. Or was it presenting a legal team of Dershowitz and Starr who are known donors of Republican Senators?

When you have Republican Senators publicly state there was enough evidence to clearly demonstrate intent and guilt. Yet declare they won’t vote to remove due partisanship; yeah that’s totally “winning”.

Look I get it. You and many others who identify as “conservative” have an affinity for authoritarians. Not all of us are boot lickers or prone to bend the proverbial knee.

You say “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, I say “Trump Devotion Syndrome”. Either way you slice it TDS is a problem, especially when we got people who never read the Mueller Report or Trumps “transcript” running around like they have. I bet you think you’re an objective critical free thinker too.

Another runaway.

Of course you wouldn't, then again according to you Hillary is the real President.

The Democrats just handed the 2020 election to President Trump while jeopardizing their hold in the House. How they handled this was so distasteful and hate filled that it created a very negative association between Peloski, Schiff and other such visible Democrats and the impeachment process. Basically they made Trump look like a victim of a hate crime. In the realm of pure optics President Trump won big time.

Having such publicly draconian House hearings with selection leaks followed by the same person having hate filled public speeches in the Senate for a "trial" was a very bad idea. The better strategy for the Dems would of been a muted non-committal hearing followed by an independent counsel appointed as the prosecutor to the Senate.

No impact on the 2020 Presidential election, and considering the fundraising gap going on in the House, the Dems don't have much to worry about there either. Also considering a majority of the Senate said Trump was guilty they just couldn't vote to convict him because they didn't want to be ostracized the way Romney has been, Trump was certainly not a victim of anything. He was guilty.

Oh look, Vic is resorting to absolutes and making stuff up again. What a surprise.

And what is Saevel doing? The exact same thing. Thanks for the heads up Rav!

I just heard it put this way, the left is losing the meme war because they only speak in absolutes.

Also, Trump speaks in memes.

That nearly bad me shooting coffee out my mouth. So true yet hilarious. The President of the Unites States, speaks in memes.

Look we won get over it. Maybe if you don't nominate some dumb *** like Bernie you have a chance. But no you got to cater to the extreme left.

Trump would have to use both of his baby hands because that is one massively HOOJ vagina.

sat·ire
/ˈsaˌtī(ə)r/
noun
the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.

Can't be in an ALL-TRUMP forum and not mock the baby hands meme.
Plus, couldn't find an actual phobia of baby or tiny hands but doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

To answer the question though:
No.

This phrasing is begging for a tie in to pornography and it’s many visual tricks to enhance the scale of the “things”

Oh look it’s the guy who loves him some Voat, Stormfront And takes kekistani *** seriously.

What, the militant atheist suddenly cares about sacred burial grounds?

"He's a bad man, that mean 'ol Stagolee."

Trump shouldn't have messed with the burial grounds. He may not make it to the 2020 election.

The COLDEST cartoon I have seen....

I don't really get the point of that cartoon. I mean, they usually do suck, but still. Both parties are completely overboard in how lockstep they are with their leaders. The House had a few defects, the Senate had a single defect, but that's it. It's usually not much different in non-impeachment situations either.

Ah, so we should only elect people with religious beliefs of which you approve, and likewise let the religious beliefs of small groups influence how a secular government enforces its national security measures.