Are Large Language Models Really AI?

But its authentically AI. And it generates authentic money. Which AI slop is good at on other media so why doesn't Utube lie back, relax, and enjoy it?

They still get a cut after all ...

Paged!

I suppose the answer is the same answer to the same question asked to SE:

If RMTs/bots still pay subscription, if RMTs/bots keeps buying news accounts, why SE still takes measures against them?

The answer? That is up to debate.

I would say both SE and Youtube must consider, despite not hurting the revenue at first sight, in a long run if left unchecked the predatory behavior of those people exploiting the system will inevitably lead to the system downfall.

Youtube in particular has an extra argument. The platform itself is a hugh datalake that can be used to train new models.

But if most content on Youtube doest have human value embued, then the models arent learning new things, thus, it does make sense Youtube to want content that is at least some bit enriched by human insights, than straight AI generated content.

But I am rooting for system downfall.

The question is: If you create 100x the amount of content (absolute AI trash) and only a few of those become obscenely popular - are the costs offsetting the sudden need to host and distribute millions of new videos that generate you 0 revenue.

That was already an economics problem - hence why Youtube needed to be sold to google in the first place, but now the problem is much worse.

To the AI haters delight...

Here is the last PAID image to video conversion that I asked and fluked.

What I wanted was quite simple. Just make my avatar move a little, do lipsync and that was all.

The result surprise me... negatively!