Artemicion said:
Ah yes, in the end the objectives are on the same foot.
Only difference is Colbert has a much wider target audience and has significantly more orthodox and funnier methods of doing this.
Sadly, Anon's options are limited to the nativity of /b/ and doing silly things like denial of service attacks that ultimately accomplish nothing but annoyance and negative publicity.
that's my exact point, you can say the "objectives are on the same foot", but honestly it's just a method of getting more attention on "anonymous", it's not really there to help Assange regardless as to how much it is asserted to be.
It's as self-serving as ever.
now people are trying to make it more politically relevant.
hell they did the Scientology thing after tom cruise and others right?
these aren't campaigns for the greater good.
they are simple publicity stunts under the ruse of being publicity stunts for something already very well in the public eye.
they want to bring more attention to "anon" because of as I said before they have the attention *** aspect.
the whole difference between what it was originally was this foreign concept called "fun"
