Been arguing with a friend as to which is better, personally i see the Ragnarok being the better of the 2 due to the new GS WS and the increased Crit rate but he seems to think Apoc would fair better on higher level mobs in VW due to the higher DMG, neither of us have either weapon so we cant compare them but thought bout maybe getting one so figured i'd come here for some insight, Thanks in advance.
Ragnarok is the better damaging weapon by a decent margin as far as I know. Apocalypse offers defensive utility if it's needed, but that isn't usually a problem if you have good mages.
DRK isn't a bad job, but MNK and WAR are certainly the best voidwatch jobs. Smite and ukko exclusively really though, very likely that you have have been playing with bad WARs and MNKs.
WAR beats DRK most of the time.
Yes, I've outparsed really good warriors.
Does it happen often? no.
I actually outparse vere monks most of the time tho
But Ukon warriors are really hard to beat, as long as they'r good.
On some fights they pull ahead far too lol
Wonder how much the ukko nerf is gonna change that <_>
WAR and MNK are simply stronger voidwatch jobs, you are just being stubborn or ignorant if you fail to realize this. Ukko and smite nerf are both quite minor and won't have a major impact on things at all. WAR is generally the stronger of the two, unless the fight ends before impetus is off.
Play with good MNKs during ~3min VW fights and then say that. lolparse etc. but our best vere mnk usually comes out ahead or slightly behind our best ukko WARs on Qilin for example. Things like blood rage obviously skew things in MNKs favor though.
WAR is a bit stronger at the moment, MNK however is definitely not sir.
I'd say a good monk can be better, but it seems rather rare to find monks like that.
(Not counting fights where one person had to proc lots more than the other, etc)
We pretty much only rely on mage procs for almost everything, smite average is a good bit higher than ukko average if they don't get unlucky on impetus and both are fully buffed. MNK usually falls behind by a bit on fights that last over 3mins assuming people are buffed and not slacking.
You are in a terrible group if it doesn't have 2 DD parties with COR(hopefully brd as well, but often only one with brd). The slacking part comes down to people being terrible players or not, which sadly the majority of FFXI is.
We pretty much only rely on mage procs for almost everything, smite average is a good bit higher than ukko average if they don't get unlucky on impetus and both are fully buffed. MNK usually falls behind by a bit on fights that last over 3mins assuming people are buffed and not slacking.
For sure, good monks just seem rare to find vs good warriors :P
As much as I would like to be greedy and give myself a 4 buffer whm DD party, I don't think the rest of my alliance would like that. Kind of neat if you already have a SMN though, but avatars usually end up dying to AOE due to low hp and no pet fanatic's.
Holy ***did this thread get derailed, from ragnarok and apoc to SMN.
As much as I would like to be greedy and give myself a 4 buffer whm DD party, I don't think the rest of my alliance would like that. Kind of neat if you already have a SMN though, but avatars usually end up dying to AOE due to low hp and no pet fanatic's.
Holy ***did this thread get derailed, from ragnarok and apoc to SMN.
Apocalypse all the things.
The summoner can go in another party, if a second bard or corsair is lacking they do well to fill the slot last I checked with max skill + horn it is about 20% DA.
To the OP, Apocalypse if you are doing 1 it is a marvelous band-aid.
Been arguing with a friend as to which is better, personally i see the Ragnarok being the better of the 2 due to the new GS WS and the increased Crit rate but he seems to think Apoc would fair better on higher level mobs in VW due to the higher DMG, neither of us have either weapon so we cant compare them but thought bout maybe getting one so figured i'd come here for some insight, Thanks in advance.