Dem Dems Aiming At 2020
|
Dem Dems aiming at 2020
And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties.
[+]
Sorry was really long and didn't want a huge post chain. Most of that stuff is about voter demographics, middle / worker class white folks don't reproduce fast enough to breed more Democrat voters. Generational unemployables reproduce faster, so many baby daddies and such but tend to all stay in the same area. In order for the Democrats to take power and bring about the Communist Revolution they need to have near absolute control, in order to do that they need to produce voters much faster then Republicans. All research has shown that religious and political choices are largely determined by a person's parents and upbringing. So if the Democrats can bring in my left leaning young poor folks, they can bulk breed Democrat voters who will then in turn breed more Democrat voters and in a few more generations they'll be enough to just absolute the Constitution and vote themselves a Communist state. That's an actual Progressive plan from decades ago. Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Except for the fact that ostriches don’t actually do that. So I guess your analogy only works if you’re using the cartoon/urban legend version of the ostrich instead of the real ostrich which would be much more likely to kick the crap out of you if cornered.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Except for the fact that ostriches don’t actually do that. So I guess your analogy only works if you’re using the cartoon/urban legend version of the ostrich instead of the real ostrich which would be much more likely to kick the crap out of you if cornered. You of all people should know how right I am about blocking. You learned that lesson the hard way. :) kireek said: » ... The right on the other hand are doubling down on the
[+]
Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Except for the fact that ostriches don’t actually do that. So I guess your analogy only works if you’re using the cartoon/urban legend version of the ostrich instead of the real ostrich which would be much more likely to kick the crap out of you if cornered. You of all people should know how right I am about blocking. You learned that lesson the hard way. :) I have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re rarely right, and you have never taught me a lesson. Care to elaborate?
[+]
DirectX said: » I bet Rav owns a MAGA hat and flywheel Neither, but cool story.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Except for the fact that ostriches don’t actually do that. So I guess your analogy only works if you’re using the cartoon/urban legend version of the ostrich instead of the real ostrich which would be much more likely to kick the crap out of you if cornered. You of all people should know how right I am about blocking. You learned that lesson the hard way. :) I have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re rarely right, and you have never taught me a lesson. Care to elaborate? Aw, don't you remember? You had me blocked at one point, and were under the erroneous impression that it prevented me from replying to you. I was surprised you didn't know all it did was prevent you from seeing my posts/replies. That's when you employed the services of Little Birdy to keep you up to date on my posts. Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Except for the fact that ostriches don’t actually do that. So I guess your analogy only works if you’re using the cartoon/urban legend version of the ostrich instead of the real ostrich which would be much more likely to kick the crap out of you if cornered. You of all people should know how right I am about blocking. You learned that lesson the hard way. :) I have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re rarely right, and you have never taught me a lesson. Care to elaborate? Aw, don't you remember? You had me blocked at one point, and were under the erroneous impression that it prevented me from replying to you. I was surprised you didn't know all it did was prevent you from seeing my posts/replies. That's when you employed the services of Little Birdy to keep you up to date on my posts. Uh, no, I never assumed it meant that you could not reply to me. I was just wondering why you insisted on doing it constantly when you knew I had you blocked. All "little birdy" did was point out how hilarious it was. Then again, as I said, you rarely get anything right. Keep that streak going.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Viciouss said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And the mods still haven't banned Vic? The dude is violating the rules left and right. Anyone not on the left does that and it's met with harsh permanent penalties. I'm not worried about getting banned for calling out a coward that takes shots at posters in this section while having them all blocked. Its called posting in bad faith, and Saevel is the only one guilty of it. The mods are aware of it, and since he hasn't stopped, neither will I. In general, I don't think blocking is ever a wise choice. It limits the information being provided. It is the proverbial head-in-the-sand ostrich...if it doesn't see anything it doesn't like, then that must mean it doesn't exist. Of course, ostriches are stupid creatures, lacking the ability to face opposition. Except for the fact that ostriches don’t actually do that. So I guess your analogy only works if you’re using the cartoon/urban legend version of the ostrich instead of the real ostrich which would be much more likely to kick the crap out of you if cornered. You of all people should know how right I am about blocking. You learned that lesson the hard way. :) I have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re rarely right, and you have never taught me a lesson. Care to elaborate? Aw, don't you remember? You had me blocked at one point, and were under the erroneous impression that it prevented me from replying to you. I was surprised you didn't know all it did was prevent you from seeing my posts/replies. That's when you employed the services of Little Birdy to keep you up to date on my posts. Uh, no, I never assumed it meant that you could not reply to me. I was just wondering why you insisted on doing it constantly when you knew I had you blocked. All "little birdy" did was point out how hilarious it was. Then again, as I said, you rarely get anything right. Keep that streak going. It's actually a bit of a fun read, especially when Nausi outs himself as your Little Birdy. Poor guy, not the sharpest tool in the shed was he? He liked using that "Nothing Burger" cliche...to be honest, I don't think I've ever seen anyone else here use it. It actually wasn't Nausi. He just didn't go out of his way to deny it for some reason. Swing and another miss.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » It actually wasn't Nausi. He just didn't go out of his way to deny it for some reason. Swing and another miss. So what other service was he providing you with? Is it something you can share...publicly? Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It actually wasn't Nausi. He just didn't go out of his way to deny it for some reason. Swing and another miss. So what other service was he providing you with? Is it something you can share...publicly? It wasn't him. I think that was in reference to the fact that he was replying to you, and therefore I could see your posts through him. You're desperately trying to make something out of this and it's not working.
[+]
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It actually wasn't Nausi. He just didn't go out of his way to deny it for some reason. Swing and another miss. So what other service was he providing you with? Is it something you can share...publicly? It wasn't him. I think that was in reference to the fact that he was replying to you, and therefore I could see your posts through him. You're desperately trying to make something out of this and it's not working. I'm just reminiscing on some fond memories. You seem very defensive and agitated, and there is no need to be. Asura.Saevel said: » Um no it doesn't. The radical right was kicked the curb years ago during the Obama time frame and this was put to rest in 2016 when non-Republican Trump beat the other candidates. Trump ran on conservative ideology and was further supported by evangelicals and the KKK. You have the "never Trumps" that would be more towards the moderate conservatives than the "Trump's #1" crowd. Face it, Trump's main supporters are the radical "alt right" as well as the "never Hillary" crowds followed by the ones that vote straight ticket, people that picked the lesser of two weasels, and last, but not least, the ones that didn't vote third party because they don't like to vote for people who have no shot of winning. The radicals weren't booted, they just weren't given air time on Fox and CNN. Quote: Its interesting that you find being "white supremacist" a bad thing while ignoring the "black supremacists" that are opening encouraged by those elected on the left. Nice strawman. Quote: On the right, racist *** are told to GTFO, on the left they are openly embraced and celebrated. No, they're told to STFU, but keep voting. Quote: And do we really need to get into the left hiding the pedo rape island, though that's more of an elite thing (who are overwhelmingly Democrat now). WTF? Seriously, did you just yank this steaming turd fresh from Trump's *** or is there a reason you bring this up? Trump's also partaken in Epstein's partying. To what extent, I have no idea. I'm not even going to fling mud on that, but there's enough shame and blame to go around. Anyone connected to Epstein's debauchery should be charged and brought before a judge, and I mean ANYONE, even Trump and Clinton if they had anything to do with it. Quote: You sound like a moderate leftist who doesn't like the Democrat party, really doesn't like Trump but can't quite bring themselves to not view the Republicans as "evil". So instead you brand both as "equally evil" to not feel bad. I prefer to view myself as a Constitutionalist, but I'll take moderate leftist so long as that includes being a Capitalist, because honestly, nothing really good comes from pure Socialism.
[+]
If your police forces allow child molestation out of fear of being called racists, you have a much different issue my friend. That's plain piss-***-ignorance. The police could absolutely spin that back around, but what you're saying is that they lack the critical thinking to do so.
[+]
Video games, movies, and music have taken a hit from one extreme group or the other since their inception. Christian conservatives rallied against AC/DC at one point way back when. Marilyn Manson is a great example as well. Rockstar games has put out content that was questionable to some, but it was still put out.
Comedians....come on man have you not seen Bob Sagget? Burt Kreisher? Tom Segura? Yeah they're not being redacted. You want to talk about removing history? Ok, go look up school resource books for American schools that reference slavery in the US. Native-Americans and the atrocities that happened to them. Those areas have been redacted for a long time by the Christian conservatives and federal government in order to hide what was done. Hell, I bet if I put up an American history book referencing the war between the colonies and Britain circa 1776 against one from your country that we'd see some vastly different accounts.
[+]
Perfect example right here, can have actual racists visit the White House but as long they aren't white then it's allowed. Republicans and Conservatives hated Trump in 2015/2016, so much so that he had to resort to threatening them to prevent them from doing what they in 2012. Heck what the Democrats just did in 2020. Trump is not a Conservative, never was a Conservative and has spent the majority of his life supporting both the Democrats and the Republicans as the need arose. But that doesn't matter to you does it, you see the "R", everything turns red and the reality distortion field engages. Even rewriting history to let yourself be the hero. *golf clap* Here's a participation trophy Asura.Saevel said: » bunch of stuff that was way off the mark I'm registered Republican. Only time I ever voted Democrat was against Mary Fallin in 2014 and if you do a cursory search of her you'd see why. God she was horrible. Voting history: Bush, Bush, McCain, Romney, Johnson. Congratulations on being completely wrong. Keep up the great work buddy, you're doing terrific.
[+]
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.