Carbuncle.Nynja said: »
Afania said: »
Big tech companies aren't stupid, they aren't going to hire someone who can't even read.
My last comment was about education system, not dei hire. Idk why you keep dragging the conversation into dei hire category...
But to reply your point: Being illegal is one thing, and surely you can criticize hiring practice being illegal, since this is law based.
But being ineffective in business is another discussion.
Does it matter if a company saved a janitor position for marginalized person, even though every other important position that matters is still hiring based on merits?
Say for example, if a cyber security company only hire cyber security experts based on merits, but give less relevant positions like Janitor, book keeper to marginalized person, will this cyber security company perform poorly as a result?
Or, if a marketing company decided to give a position to an Indian, in return they benefit from being able to market products to Indian demographics better with Indian perspective, is it a bad thing?
You have to discuss how the hiring practice works in depth before arriving at the conclusion that this is always bad practice, and it's case by case anyways. That's why I find generalized DEI hire practice mostly not worth discussing unless you give me a very specific example on execution in detail.
